Hardiess Gregor, Papageorgiou Eleni, Schiefer Ulrich, Mallot Hanspeter A
Faculty of Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen, Germany.
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 11;50(12):1158-72. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
We investigated the task-specific role of eye and head movements as a compensatory strategy in patients with homonymous visual field deficits (HVFDs) and in age-matched normal controls. All participants were tested in two tasks, i.e. a dot counting (DC) task requiring mostly simple visual scanning and a cognitively more demanding comparative visual search (CVS) task. The CVS task involved recognition and memory of geometrical objects and their configuration in two test fields. Based on task performance, patients were assigned to one of two groups, "adequate" (HVFD(A)) and "inadequate" (HVFD(I)); the group definitions based on either task turned out to be identical. With respect to the gaze related parameters in the DC task we obtained results in agreement with previous studies: the gaze pattern of HVFD(A) patients and normal controls did not differ significantly, while HVFD(I) patients showed increased gaze movement activity. In contrast, for the more complex CVS task we identified a deviating pattern of compensatory strategy use. Adequately performing subjects, who had used the same gaze strategies as normals in the DC task, now changed to increased gaze movement activity that allowed coping with the increasing task demands. Inadequately performing patients switched to a novel pattern of compensatory behavior in the CVS task. Different compensatory strategies are discussed with respect to the task-specific demands (in particular working memory involvement), the specific behavioral deficits of the patients, and the corresponding brain lesions.
我们研究了眼动和头部运动作为一种代偿策略在同侧视野缺损(HVFDs)患者及年龄匹配的正常对照者中的特定任务作用。所有参与者均接受两项任务测试,即主要需要简单视觉扫描的点数(DC)任务和认知要求更高的比较视觉搜索(CVS)任务。CVS任务涉及在两个测试区域中对几何物体及其构型的识别和记忆。根据任务表现,患者被分为两组之一,“充分代偿组”(HVFD(A))和“代偿不足组”(HVFD(I));基于任何一项任务得出的分组定义结果相同。关于DC任务中与注视相关的参数,我们获得的结果与先前研究一致:HVFD(A)组患者和正常对照者的注视模式无显著差异,而HVFD(I)组患者的注视运动活动增加。相比之下,对于更复杂的CVS任务,我们发现了一种不同的代偿策略使用模式。在DC任务中采用与正常人相同注视策略的充分代偿受试者,此时转变为增加注视运动活动,以应对不断增加的任务需求。代偿不足的患者在CVS任务中转变为一种新的代偿行为模式。针对特定任务需求(特别是工作记忆参与情况)、患者的特定行为缺陷以及相应的脑损伤,对不同的代偿策略进行了讨论。