Suppr超能文献

一项旨在证明每日一次 OROS(®)氢吗啡酮与每日两次缓释羟考酮治疗中重度慢性非癌痛等效性的随机研究。

A randomized study to demonstrate noninferiority of once-daily OROS(®) hydromorphone with twice-daily sustained-release oxycodone for moderate to severe chronic noncancer pain.

机构信息

Schmerz-Zentrum am St.Franziskus Hospital Ahlen, Ahlen, Germany.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):404-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00342.x.

Abstract

This was a randomized, open-label, comparative, parallel group study designed to demonstrate the noninferiority of once-daily OROS(®) hydromorphone compared with twice-daily sustained-release (SR) oxycodone in subjects with chronic noncancer pain severe enough to require continuous opioid therapy. The core phase (24 weeks) consisted of titration and maintenance periods. This was followed by an optional extension phase (28 weeks), which collected data used to assess long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. Five hundred four subjects were randomized between the 2 treatment groups. The primary efficacy analysis showed that OROS hydromorphone was noninferior to SR oxycodone (P = 0.011) as measured by change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity subscore "pain right now." The treatment difference with respect to change in BPI pain severity subscore "pain right now" was 0.29 (95% confidence interval: -0.27 to 0.84). The equianalgesic doses were 16 mg OROS hydromorphone and 40 mg SR oxycodone (median values). Secondary outcomes included other BPI scale items, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Indices, and quality of life measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Both treatment groups showed improvements in the main secondary efficacy endpoints. No statistically significant differences were shown between the treatment groups, except for the scores for somnolence (MOS sleep subscale) and physical functioning (SF-36), which both had a statistically significant difference between treatments groups in favor of OROS hydromorphone. Both study medications had equivalent and acceptable safety profiles. The results of this open-label study showed that once-daily OROS hydromorphone is a safe and well-tolerated treatment for chronic pain and as efficacious as twice-daily SR oxycodone.

摘要

这是一项随机、开放标签、对照、平行组研究,旨在证明每日一次 OROS(®)氢吗啡酮与每日两次缓释(SR)羟考酮相比在慢性非癌痛患者中的非劣效性,这些患者的疼痛严重程度足以需要持续使用阿片类药物治疗。核心阶段(24 周)包括滴定和维持期。随后是可选的扩展阶段(28 周),收集用于评估长期安全性和疗效结果的数据。504 名受试者被随机分配到 2 个治疗组。主要疗效分析显示,以简明疼痛量表(BPI)疼痛严重程度子量表“现在疼痛”的变化衡量,氢吗啡酮 OROS 非劣效于 SR 羟考酮(P = 0.011)。与 BPI 疼痛严重程度子量表“现在疼痛”的变化相比,治疗差异为 0.29(95%置信区间:-0.27 至 0.84)。等效镇痛剂量为 16mg OROS 氢吗啡酮和 40mg SR 羟考酮(中位数)。次要结局包括其他 BPI 量表项目、医疗结果研究(MOS)睡眠指数以及通过 36 项简短形式(SF-36)问卷测量的生活质量。两个治疗组在主要次要疗效终点都显示出改善。除了在治疗组之间具有统计学意义差异的嗜睡(MOS 睡眠子量表)和身体机能(SF-36)评分外,两个治疗组之间没有显示出统计学上显著的差异。两种治疗药物都具有相似的可接受的安全性。这项开放标签研究的结果表明,每日一次的 OROS 氢吗啡酮是一种安全且耐受良好的慢性疼痛治疗药物,与每日两次的 SR 羟考酮同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验