Garvey Lucy, Latch Ngaire, Erlwein Otto W, Mackie Nicola E, Walsh John, Scullard George, McClure Myra O, Dickinson Laura, Back David, Winston Alan
Imperial College, Norfolk Place, London, UK.
Antivir Ther. 2010;15(2):213-8. doi: 10.3851/IMP1517.
Nucleoside-sparing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens might be an attractive therapeutic option for HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected patients; however, the pharmacokinetic profiles of such regimens are frequently unknown.
Fourteen HIV-1-infected patients (age 21-55 years, 64% male) on stable cART with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/ml entered this Phase I pharmacokinetic study. In period 1, patients received tenofovir/emtricitabine/-darunavir/ritonavir (300/200/800/100 mg) all once daily. During period 2, raltegravir 400 mg twice daily was added to the regimen and in period 3 tenofovir/emtricitabine was discontinued. At steady state, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was undertaken. Differences in the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for pharmacokinetic parameters between periods 2 versus 1 and period 3 versus 1 were assessed for darunavir and ritonavir (period 3 versus 2 for raltegravir).
No statistically significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between period 2 versus period 1. During period 3, darunavir GMR (95% confidence interval) values for trough and maximum plasma concentration (C(trough) and C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)) were 0.64 ng/ml (0.44-0.93), 1.05 ng/ml (0.90-1.24), 0.92 ng h/ml (0.78-1.08) and 0.69 h (0.46-1.05), respectively, when compared with period 1. No statistically significant changes were observed in ritonavir or raltegravir pharmacokinetic parameters. Darunavir C(trough)<550 ng/ml (the minimum effective concentration for protease-resistant HIV viral isolates) was observed in four patients during period 3 only. No clinically significant safety concerns were reported.
Darunavir C(trough) is reduced by 36% when administered without tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected patients. This interaction might be of clinical significance in the management of individuals with protease-resistant HIV viral isolates.
核苷类药物节省型联合抗逆转录病毒疗法(cART)方案可能是1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)感染患者的一种有吸引力的治疗选择;然而,此类方案的药代动力学特征往往尚不明确。
14名接受稳定cART治疗且血浆HIV RNA<50拷贝/ml的HIV-1感染患者(年龄21 - 55岁,64%为男性)进入了这项I期药代动力学研究。在第1阶段,患者每天一次接受替诺福韦/恩曲他滨/达芦那韦/利托那韦(300/200/800/100毫克)。在第2阶段,将拉替拉韦400毫克每日两次添加到方案中,在第3阶段停用替诺福韦/恩曲他滨。在稳态时,进行了密集的药代动力学采样。评估了第2阶段与第1阶段以及第3阶段与第1阶段之间达芦那韦和利托那韦药代动力学参数的几何平均比值(GMR)差异(拉替拉韦为第3阶段与第2阶段相比)。
第2阶段与第1阶段之间未观察到药代动力学参数有统计学显著差异。在第3阶段,与第1阶段相比,达芦那韦谷浓度和最大血浆浓度(C(trough)和C(max))、血浆浓度 - 时间曲线下面积(AUC)以及消除半衰期(t(1/2))的GMR(95%置信区间)值分别为0.64纳克/毫升(0.44 - 0.93)、1.05纳克/毫升(0.90 - 1.24)、0.92纳克·小时/毫升(0.78 - 1.08)和0.69小时(0.46 - 1.05)。利托那韦或拉替拉韦的药代动力学参数未观察到有统计学显著变化。仅在第3阶段有4名患者观察到达芦那韦C(trough)<550纳克/毫升(对蛋白酶抗性HIV病毒分离株的最低有效浓度)。未报告有临床显著的安全问题。
在HIV-1感染患者中,不与替诺福韦/恩曲他滨联合使用时,达芦那韦C(trough)降低36%。这种相互作用在管理蛋白酶抗性HIV病毒分离株患者中可能具有临床意义。