Horiguchi Akio, Sumitomo Makoto, Kanbara Taiki, Tsujita Yujiro, Yoshii Takahiko, Yoshii Hidehiko, Satoh Akinori, Asakuma Junichi, Ito Keiichi, Hayakawa Masamichi, Asano Tomohiko
Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2010 Mar;101(3):547-53. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.101.547.
We evaluated the efficacy and outcome of one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty, which is currently the procedure of choice for treating lengthy and complicated urethral strictures not amenable to excision and primary end-to-end anastomosis.
Seven patients 33 to 74 years old (mean age = 53.7) underwent one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for a stricture in either the bulbar urethra (four patients), penile urethra (two patients), or pan-anterior urethra (one patient). Three of the strictures were due to trauma, one was due to inflammation, and one was due to a failed hypospadia repair. The other two were iatrogenic. All patients had previously undergone either internal urethrotomy or repeated urethral dilation. Three patients received a tube graft, three received a ventral onlay, and one received a dorsal onlay. A free graft of oral mucosa was harvested from the inside of each patient's left cheek, and if necessary to obtain a sufficient length, the harvest was extended to include mucosa from the lower lip and the right cheek. The graft lengths ranged from 2.5 to 12 cm (mean = 4.6 cm). A urethral catheter was left in place for 3 weeks postoperatively.
While no severe complications at the donor site were observed during follow-up periods ranging from 3 to 55 months (mean = 14 months), two patients who had received a tube graft developed distal anastomotic ring strictures that were managed by internal urethrotomy. The other five required no postoperative urological procedure even though one who had received a ventral onlay developed a penoscrotal fistula.
Oral mucosa is an ideal urethral graft, and oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is an effective procedure for repairing complicated urethral strictures involving long portions of the urethra.
我们评估了一期口腔黏膜移植尿道成形术的疗效和结果,该手术目前是治疗冗长且复杂的尿道狭窄(不适用于切除和一期端端吻合术)的首选方法。
7例年龄在33至74岁(平均年龄 = 53.7岁)的患者因球部尿道狭窄(4例)、阴茎尿道狭窄(2例)或全前尿道狭窄(1例)接受了一期口腔黏膜移植尿道成形术。其中3例狭窄由外伤引起,1例由炎症引起,1例由尿道下裂修复失败引起。另外2例为医源性。所有患者此前均接受过尿道内切开术或反复尿道扩张术。3例患者接受了管状移植,3例接受了腹侧覆盖移植,1例接受了背侧覆盖移植。从每位患者左脸颊内侧获取口腔黏膜游离移植片,如有必要获取足够长度,则将取材范围扩大至下唇和右脸颊的黏膜。移植片长度为2.5至12厘米(平均 = 4.6厘米)。术后留置尿道导管3周。
在3至55个月(平均 = 14个月)的随访期内,未观察到供体部位出现严重并发症,不过2例接受管状移植的患者出现了远端吻合口环形狭窄,通过尿道内切开术进行了处理。其他5例患者术后无需进行泌尿外科手术,尽管1例接受腹侧覆盖移植的患者出现了阴茎阴囊瘘。
口腔黏膜是理想的尿道移植材料,口腔黏膜移植尿道成形术是修复累及尿道长段的复杂尿道狭窄的有效方法。