Department of Sports Medicine, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Neth Heart J. 2010 Mar;18(3):118-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03091749.
Background. To evaluate the safety and effects of high altitude on exercise level and heart rate in patients with coronary artery disease compared with healthy controls.Methods. Eight patients with a history of an acute myocardial infarction (ejection fraction >5%) with a low-risk score were compared with seven healthy subjects during the Dutch Heart Expedition at the Aconcagua in Argentina in March 2007. All subjects underwent a maximum exercise test with a cycle ergometer at sea level and base camp, after ten days of acclimatisation, at an altitude of 4200 m. Exercise capacity and maximum heart rate were compared between groups and within subjects.Results. There was a significant decrease in maximum heart rate at high altitude compared with sea level in both the patient and the control group (166 vs. 139 beats/min, p<0.001 and 181 vs. 150 beats/min, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the decrease of the exercise level and maximum heart rate between patients and healthy controls (-31 vs. -30%, p=0.673).Conclusion. Both patients and healthy controls showed a similar decrease in exercise capacity and maximum heart rate at 4200 m compared with sea level, suggesting that patients with a history of coronary artery disease may tolerate stay and exercise at high altitude similarly to healthy controls. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:118-21.).
评估与健康对照组相比,高海拔对冠心病患者运动水平和心率的安全性和影响。
2007 年 3 月,在阿根廷的阿空加瓜山,将 8 名有急性心肌梗死病史(射血分数>5%)和低风险评分的患者与 7 名健康受试者进行比较。所有受试者在海拔 4200 米的地方进行了为期 10 天的适应后,在海平面和大本营使用自行车测力计进行了最大运动测试。比较两组之间和组内的运动能力和最大心率。
与海平面相比,高海拔时患者和对照组的最大心率均显著下降(166 与 139 次/分,p<0.001 和 181 与 150 次/分,p<0.001)。患者和健康对照组之间运动水平和最大心率的下降无显著差异(-31%与-30%,p=0.673)。
与海平面相比,患者和健康对照组在海拔 4200 米时的运动能力和最大心率均有相似程度的下降,这表明有冠心病病史的患者可能可以耐受高海拔的停留和运动,与健康对照组相似。(荷兰心脏杂志 2010;18:118-21.)。