Epicentre, Paris, France.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 May;14(5):571-7.
Bleach sedimentation is a method used to increase the diagnostic yield of sputum microscopy for countries with a high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and limited resources.
To compare the relative cost-effectiveness of different microscopy approaches in diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) in Kenya.
An analytical decision tree model including cost and effectiveness measures of 10 combinations of direct (D) and overnight bleach (B) sedimentation microscopy was constructed. Data were drawn from the evaluation of the bleach sedimentation method on two specimens (first on the spot [1] and second morning [2]) from 644 TB suspects in a peripheral health clinic. Incremental cost per smear-positive detected case was measured. Costs included human resources and materials using a micro-costing evaluation.
All bleach-based microscopy approaches detected significantly more cases (between 23.3% for B1 and 25.9% for B1+B2) than the conventional D1+D2 approach (21.0%). Cost per tested case ranged between respectively euro 2.7 and euro 4.5 for B1 and B1+D2+B2. B1 and B1+B2 were the most cost-effective approaches. D1+B2 and D1+B1 were good alternatives to avoid using approaches exclusively based on bleach sedimentation microscopy.
Among several effective microscopy approaches used, including sodium hypochlorite sedimentation, only some resulted in a limited increase in the laboratory workload and would be most suitable for programmatic implementation.
漂白沉降法是一种用于提高痰显微镜检查诊断率的方法,尤其适用于艾滋病毒(HIV)感染率高且资源有限的国家。
比较肯尼亚不同显微镜检查方法在诊断结核病(TB)方面的相对成本效益。
构建了一个包括直接(D)和过夜漂白(B)沉降显微镜 10 种组合的成本效益分析决策树模型。数据来自在一个外围医疗诊所的 644 例疑似结核病患者的两项标本(现场的第一个标本[1]和第二天早上的第二个标本[2])中评估漂白沉降方法的结果。衡量了每例痰涂片阳性检测病例的增量成本。成本包括人力资源和材料,采用微观成本评估。
所有基于漂白的显微镜检查方法都显著增加了检测病例数量(B1 为 23.3%,B1+B2 为 25.9%),而传统的 D1+D2 方法仅为 21.0%。每个检测病例的成本分别为 B1 为 2.7 欧元,B1+D2+B2 为 4.5 欧元。B1 和 B1+B2 是最具成本效益的方法。D1+B2 和 D1+B1 是避免仅使用基于漂白沉降显微镜检查方法的替代方法。
在几种有效的显微镜检查方法中,包括次氯酸钠沉降法,只有少数方法会导致实验室工作量的有限增加,最适合方案实施。