Lansbury Louise, Leonardi-Bee Jo, Perkins William, Goodacre Timothy, Tweed John A, Bath-Hextall Fiona J
Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, The University of Nottingham, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2NR.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD007869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007869.pub2.
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common skin cancer, and is becoming increasingly common around the world. Left untreated, it may spread to other parts of the body, and, although the risk is low, it may ultimately lead to death. Surgical excision is the first line of treatment for most skin SCCs, although other forms of treatment are also used depending upon the nature and site of the tumour and individual participant factors. A multi-professional approach is therefore required for the management of people with this condition.
To assess the effects of treatments for primary non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
In February 2010 we searched for relevant trials in The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2010), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, LILACS, and the ongoing trials registries.
We only included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for primary SCC of the skin. Inclusion criteria were: adults with one or more histologically proven primary SCCs of the skin which had not metastasised. The primary outcome measures were time to recurrence one to five years after treatment, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes included early treatment failure within six months, number of adverse events by the end of treatment, aesthetic appearance as assessed by the participant and clinician, discomfort to the participant during and after treatment, and death.
Two authors (LL, FB-H) independently carried out study selection and assessment of methodological quality and data extraction.
One trial involving 65 people was included. This compared the time to recurrence in participants with aggressive skin SCC who were randomised to receive either adjuvant 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alpha after surgery with or without radiation treatment, or no adjuvant therapy after their initial treatment. There was no significant difference in time to recurrence of tumour between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence intervals 0.43 to 2.72).Most studies identified from the searches were excluded as they were either uncontrolled case series, did not include participants with invasive primary SCC, or included only participants with recurrent or metastatic disease.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Little evidence from RCTs comparing the efficacy of different interventions for primary cutaneous SCCs exists. There is a clear need for well-designed randomised studies in order to improve the evidence base for the management of this condition.
鳞状细胞癌(SCC)是第二常见的皮肤癌,在全球范围内正变得越来越普遍。若不治疗,它可能会扩散至身体其他部位,尽管风险较低,但最终可能导致死亡。手术切除是大多数皮肤SCC的一线治疗方法,不过根据肿瘤的性质、部位以及个体参与者因素,也会采用其他治疗形式。因此,对于患有这种疾病的人,需要采取多专业的治疗方法。
评估原发性非转移性皮肤鳞状细胞癌的治疗效果。
2010年2月,我们在Cochrane皮肤小组专业注册库、Cochrane图书馆(2010年第1期)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、AMED、LILACS以及正在进行的试验注册库中检索相关试验。
我们仅纳入了针对原发性皮肤SCC干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)。入选标准为:患有一个或多个经组织学证实的原发性皮肤SCC且未发生转移的成年人。主要结局指标为治疗后1至5年的复发时间和生活质量。次要结局包括6个月内的早期治疗失败、治疗结束时的不良事件数量、参与者和临床医生评估的美观程度、治疗期间及治疗后的参与者不适情况以及死亡情况。
两位作者(LL,FB - H)独立进行研究筛选、方法学质量评估以及数据提取。
纳入了一项涉及65人的试验。该试验比较了患有侵袭性皮肤SCC的参与者的复发时间,这些参与者被随机分为术后接受辅助性13 - 顺式维甲酸和干扰素α联合或不联合放射治疗,或初始治疗后不接受辅助治疗。两组之间肿瘤复发时间无显著差异(风险比1.08,95%置信区间0.43至2.72)。从检索中确定的大多数研究被排除,因为它们要么是无对照的病例系列,未纳入侵袭性原发性SCC的参与者,要么仅纳入了复发性或转移性疾病的参与者。
关于比较不同干预措施对原发性皮肤SCC疗效的随机对照试验证据很少。显然需要设计良好的随机研究,以改善这种疾病管理的证据基础。