Suppr超能文献

经尿道前列腺切除术与经膀胱前列腺切除术治疗前列腺体积大于 80 毫升的随机试验。

A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Guangzhou First Municipal People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Urology. 2010 Oct;76(4):958-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.079. Epub 2010 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared the safety and efficacy of transvesical prostatectomy (TVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for prostate greater than 80 mL in a prospective randomized trial.

METHODS

Eighty patients with urodynamic obstruction and prostate volume >80 mL were prospectively randomized and assigned to TVP or TURP. Patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. International prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QoLS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)(.)), and postvoid residual volume (PVR) were obtained at each follow-up. Perioperative data and postoperative outcomes were compared. All complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 80 patients eligible to participate, 69 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. TURP procedure was not faster than TVP procedure (P = .41); 53.2% and 84.4% of prostatic tissue were resected after TURP and TVP, respectively (P < .001). In the TVP group, IPSS, Q(max)(.), QoLS, and PVR volume were significantly better than those in TURP group at 3 and 12 months of follow-up. At 12 months postoperatively, IPSS improved 87.6% and 62.3%, mean Q(max)(.) increased by 11.49 mL/s (230.2%) and 6.33 mL/s (102%), and mean PVR volume decreased by 71.2 mL (88.6%) and 65.4 mL (70.5%) in TVP and TURP group, respectively. Two TURP patients developed urethral stricture requiring reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

TVP may be more effective and safer than TURP for the benign prostatic hyperplasia patient whose prostate volume is >80 mL.

摘要

目的

我们在一项前瞻性随机试验中比较了经膀胱前列腺切除术(TVP)和经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)治疗前列腺体积大于 80ml 的安全性和疗效。

方法

80 例尿动力学梗阻且前列腺体积>80ml 的患者前瞻性随机分为 TVP 或 TURP 组。患者术前评估,并在术后 3 个月和 12 个月进行随访。在每次随访时获取国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QoLS)、最大尿流率(Qmax)和残余尿量(PVR)。比较围手术期数据和术后结果。记录所有并发症。

结果

80 例符合条件的患者中,69 例完成了 12 个月的随访。TURP 手术并不快于 TVP 手术(P =.41);TURP 和 TVP 切除的前列腺组织分别为 53.2%和 84.4%(P <.001)。在 TVP 组,在 3 个月和 12 个月的随访中,IPSS、Qmax、QoLS 和 PVR 体积均明显优于 TURP 组。术后 12 个月,IPSS 改善 87.6%和 62.3%,平均 Qmax 增加 11.49ml/s(230.2%)和 6.33ml/s(102%),平均 PVR 体积分别减少 71.2ml(88.6%)和 65.4ml(70.5%)。2 例 TURP 患者发生尿道狭窄需再次手术。

结论

对于前列腺体积>80ml 的良性前列腺增生患者,TVP 可能比 TURP 更有效、更安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验