Suppr超能文献

前庭神经鞘瘤治疗方案的决策分析。

Decision analysis of treatment options for vestibular schwannoma.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;114(2):400-13. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.JNS091802. Epub 2010 Apr 16.

Abstract

OBJECT

Widespread use of MR imaging has contributed to the more frequent diagnosis of vestibular schwannomas (VSs). These tumors represent 10% of primary adult intracranial neoplasms, and if they are symptomatic, they usually present with hearing loss and tinnitus. Currently, there are 3 treatment options for quality of life (QOL): wait and scan, microsurgery, and radiosurgery. In this paper, the authors' purpose is to determine which treatment modality yields the highest QOL at 5- and 10-year follow-up, considering the likelihood of recurrence and various complications.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane online databases were searched for English-language articles published between 1990 and June 2008, containing key words relating to VS. Data were pooled to calculate the prevalence of treatment complications, tumor recurrence, and QOL with various complications. For parameters in which incidence varied with time of follow-up, the authors used meta-regression to determine the mean prevalence rates at a specified length of follow-up. A decision-analytical model was constructed to compare 5- and 10-year outcomes for a patient with a unilateral tumor and partially intact hearing. The 3 treatment options, wait and scan, microsurgery, and radiosurgery, were compared.

RESULTS

After screening more than 2500 abstracts, the authors ultimately included 113 articles in this analysis. Recurrence, complication rates, and onset of complication varied with the treatment chosen. The relative QOL at the 5-year follow-up was 0.898 of normal for wait and scan, 0.953 for microsurgery, and 0.97 for radiosurgery. These differences are significant (p < 0.0052). Data were too scarce at the 10-year follow-up to calculate significant differences between the microsurgery and radiosurgery strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

At 5 years, patients treated with radiosurgery have an overall better QOL than those treated with either microsurgery or those investigated further with serial imaging. The authors found that the complications associated with wait-and-scan and microsurgery treatment strategies negatively impacted patient lives more than the complications from radiosurgery. One limitation of this study is that the 10-year follow-up data were too limited to analyze, and more studies are needed to determine if the authors' results are still consistent at 10 years.

摘要

目的

磁共振成像(MRI)的广泛应用导致前庭神经鞘瘤(VSs)的诊断更为频繁。这些肿瘤占成人颅内原发性肿瘤的 10%,如果有症状,通常表现为听力损失和耳鸣。目前,有 3 种治疗方法可用于提高生活质量(QOL):等待和扫描、显微手术和放射外科手术。本文作者旨在确定在 5 年和 10 年随访中,哪种治疗方法能获得最高的 QOL,同时考虑复发的可能性和各种并发症。

方法

检索 1990 年至 2008 年 6 月期间发表的英文文献,检索 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 在线数据库,使用与 VS 相关的关键词。汇总数据以计算治疗并发症、肿瘤复发和各种并发症的 QOL 的患病率。对于随随访时间而变化的参数,作者使用元回归来确定特定随访长度的平均患病率。构建决策分析模型,比较单侧肿瘤且部分听力正常患者的 5 年和 10 年结果。比较等待和扫描、显微手术和放射外科手术 3 种治疗选择。

结果

在筛选了 2500 多篇摘要后,作者最终将 113 篇文章纳入本分析。复发、并发症发生率和并发症发生时间因所选择的治疗方法而异。在 5 年随访时,等待和扫描的相对 QOL 为正常的 0.898,显微手术为 0.953,放射外科为 0.97。这些差异具有统计学意义(p<0.0052)。在 10 年随访时,由于数据太少,无法计算显微手术和放射外科策略之间的显著差异。

结论

在 5 年时,接受放射外科治疗的患者的总体 QOL 优于接受显微手术或进一步进行连续影像学检查的患者。作者发现,与放射外科手术相关的并发症对患者生活的影响比等待和扫描及显微手术治疗策略的并发症更大。本研究的一个局限性是,10 年随访数据太少,无法进行分析,需要更多的研究来确定作者的结果在 10 年后是否仍然一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验