Suppr超能文献

欧洲儿科初级保健:国家间的差异。

Paediatric primary care in Europe: variation between countries.

机构信息

Primary Care Centre Pare Claret, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2010 Oct;95(10):791-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.178459. Epub 2010 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although it is known that differences in paediatric primary care (PPC) are found throughout Europe, little information exists as to where, how and who delivers this care. The aim of this study was to collect information on the current existing situation of PPC in Europe.

METHODS

A survey, in the form of a questionnaire, was distributed to the primary or secondary care delegates of 31 European countries asking for information concerning their primary paediatric care system, demographic data, professionals involved in primary care and details of their training. All of them were active paediatricians with a broad knowledge on how PPC is organised in their countries.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 29 countries. Twelve countries (41%) have a family doctor/general practitioner (GP/FD) system, seven (24%) a paediatrician-based system and 10 (35%) a combined system. The total number of paediatricians in the 29 countries is 82 078 with 33 195 (40.4%) working in primary care. In only 15 countries (51.7%), paediatric age at the primary care level is defined as 0-18 years. Training in paediatrics is 5 years or more in 20 of the 29 countries. In nine countries, training is less than 5 years. The median training time of GPs/FDs in paediatrics is 4 months (IQR 3-6), with some countries having no formal paediatric training at all. The care of adolescents and involvement in school health programmes is undertaken by different health professionals (school doctors, GPs/FDs, nurses and paediatricians) depending on the country.

CONCLUSIONS

Systems and organisations of PPC in Europe are heterogeneous. The same is true for paediatric training, school healthcare involvement and adolescent care. More research is needed to study specific healthcare indicators in order to evaluate the efficacy of different systems of PPC.

摘要

背景

尽管已知欧洲各地的儿科初级保健(PPC)存在差异,但有关在何处、如何以及由谁提供这种护理的信息却很少。本研究的目的是收集有关欧洲 PPC 现状的信息。

方法

以问卷形式向 31 个欧洲国家的初级或二级保健代表分发了一项调查,询问他们有关初级儿科保健系统、人口统计数据、参与初级保健的专业人员以及其培训详细信息的信息。所有代表均为具有广泛了解其所在国家 PPC 组织方式的活跃儿科医生。

结果

收到了来自 29 个国家的答复。12 个国家(41%)采用家庭医生/全科医生(GP/FD)系统,7 个国家(24%)采用儿科医生为基础的系统,10 个国家(35%)采用综合系统。29 个国家的儿科医生总数为 82078 人,其中 33195 人(40.4%)从事初级保健工作。在只有 15 个国家(51.7%)中,儿科年龄被定义为 0-18 岁。在 29 个国家中,有 20 个国家的儿科培训时间为 5 年或以上。在 9 个国家中,培训时间少于 5 年。GP/FD 在儿科方面的中位数培训时间为 4 个月(IQR 3-6),有些国家根本没有正式的儿科培训。不同国家的青少年保健和参与学校卫生计划由不同的卫生专业人员(学校医生、GP/FD、护士和儿科医生)负责。

结论

欧洲 PPC 的系统和组织存在差异。儿科培训、学校保健参与和青少年保健也是如此。需要进行更多研究来研究特定的医疗保健指标,以评估不同 PPC 系统的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验