Suppr超能文献

直接面向消费者的广告:澳大利亚药剂师在非处方药方面的经历。

Direct-to-consumer advertising: Australian pharmacists' experiences with non-prescription medicines.

作者信息

Chaar Betty, Kwong Kenelm

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Feb;18(1):43-50. doi: 10.1211/ijpp.18.01.0008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of over-the-counter or prescribed medicines is a highly controversial issue relating to public health care. Advocates highlight the advantages of DTCA in terms of patient awareness and autonomy. Opponents voice concerns about safety and patients' best interests. The views of physicians and consumers about DTCA have been widely investigated. There has been little research, however, in relation to pharmacists' experiences with DTCA and the impact of DTCA on pharmacy practice. The aim of this study was therefore to explore pharmacists' perceptions of DTCA in Australia and its impact on pharmacy practice.

METHODS

A semi-structured in-depth interview was conducted with a purposive convenience sample of retail pharmacists in Sydney, Australia. Interviews were recorded, transcribed ad verbatim and continued until data saturation. Emerging themes were extracted and analysed according to the grounded theory approach.

KEY FINDINGS

Pharmacists participating in this study reported concern about potential harm to patient health and well-being as a result of the influence of DTCA. DTCA was seen to impede pharmacists in the discharge of their fundamental ethical responsibilities, leading to a strong sense of disempowerment. Pharmacists' gate-keeping role was challenged by DTCA encouraging consumers to self-medicate and inducing a range of drug-seeking behaviours. Although pharmacists acknowledged that DTCA may have a role in promoting patient autonomy, in practice DTCA compromised their role in safeguarding consumers from inappropriate use of medicines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted that the impact of DTCA is not restricted to prescription medicines, but extended also to over-the-counter, pharmacist-only and other pharmacy-related products. Pharmacists perceived that DTCA disempowered them, compromising their role in safeguarding the community from inappropriate medicine use.

摘要

目的

非处方药或处方药的直接面向消费者的广告(DTCA)是一个与公共卫生保健相关的极具争议性的问题。支持者强调DTCA在提高患者认知度和自主性方面的优势。反对者则表达了对安全性和患者最大利益的担忧。医生和消费者对DTCA的看法已得到广泛研究。然而,关于药剂师在DTCA方面的经历以及DTCA对药房实践的影响的研究却很少。因此,本研究的目的是探讨澳大利亚药剂师对DTCA的看法及其对药房实践的影响。

方法

对澳大利亚悉尼的零售药剂师进行了一项半结构化的深入访谈,采用目的便利抽样法。访谈进行了录音,并逐字转录,持续进行直至数据饱和。根据扎根理论方法提取并分析了新出现的主题。

主要发现

参与本研究的药剂师报告称,担心DTCA的影响会对患者的健康和福祉造成潜在危害。DTCA被认为阻碍了药剂师履行其基本的道德责任,导致他们产生强烈的无力感。DTCA鼓励消费者自我用药并引发一系列寻药行为,从而挑战了药剂师的把关作用。尽管药剂师承认DTCA可能在促进患者自主性方面发挥作用,但在实践中,DTCA损害了他们保护消费者避免不当用药的作用。

结论

本研究强调,DTCA的影响不仅限于处方药,还扩展到非处方药、仅由药剂师调配的药品以及其他与药房相关的产品。药剂师认为DTCA使他们丧失了权力,损害了他们保护社区避免不当用药的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验