Stock M S, Beck T W, DeFreitas J M, Dillon M A
Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;50(2):97-106.
The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the linearity and reliability of the electromyographic (EMG) amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), and vastus medialis (VM).
Nine healthy men (mean +/- SD age = 25.3 +/- 4.7 years) and eleven healthy women (mean +/- SD age = 22.0 +/- 1.3 years) performed a series of randomly ordered, submaximal to maximal, concentric isokinetic muscle actions of the leg extensors at 30 degrees x s(1) on two occasions separated by at least 48 hours. During each muscle action, surface EMG signals were detected from the VL, RF and VM of the dominant thigh with bipolar surface electrode arrangements.
The coefficients of determination for the EMG amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships ranged from r2 = 0.75-0.98 and 0.64-0.99 for the VL, r2 = 0.79-0.99 and 0.60-0.98 for the RFE and r2 = 0.44-0.98 and 0.51-0.98 for the VM for trials 1 and2, respectively. In some cases, the linear EMG amplitude versus torque slope coefficient for trial 1 was significantly different from that for trial 2 for the VL and RF, but not for the VM. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the linear EMG amplitude versus torque coefficients were 0.730 (VL), 0.709 (RF), and 0.888 (VM).
These results indicated that the EMG amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles did not demonstrate enough linearity and reliability to be used for examining the contributions of neural versus hypertrophic factors to training-induced strength gains.
本研究的目的是确定股外侧肌(VL)、股直肌(RF)和股内侧肌(VM)的肌电图(EMG)幅度与动态扭矩关系的线性度和可靠性。
9名健康男性(平均±标准差年龄 = 25.3±4.7岁)和11名健康女性(平均±标准差年龄 = 22.0±1.3岁)在至少间隔48小时的两次测试中,以30度/秒的速度进行了一系列随机排序的、从次最大到最大的腿部伸肌同心等速肌肉动作。在每次肌肉动作期间,使用双极表面电极布置从优势大腿的VL、RF和VM检测表面EMG信号。
对于试验1和试验2,VL的EMG幅度与动态扭矩关系的决定系数分别为r2 = 0.75 - 0.98和0.64 - 0.99,RF的r2 = 0.79 - 0.99和0.60 - 0.98,VM的r2 = 0.44 - 0.98和0.51 - 0.98。在某些情况下,试验1的线性EMG幅度与扭矩斜率系数与试验2的VL和RF有显著差异,但VM没有。线性EMG幅度与扭矩系数的组内相关系数分别为0.730(VL)、0.709(RF)和0.888(VM)。
这些结果表明,股四头肌浅层肌肉的EMG幅度与动态扭矩关系没有表现出足够的线性度和可靠性,无法用于研究神经因素与肥大因素对训练诱导的力量增加的贡献。