Moo E K, Osman N A Abu, Pingguan-Murphy B, Abas W A B Wan, Spence W D, Solomonidis S E
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2009;11(4):37-43.
Conventionally, patellar tendon-bearing (PTB) sockets, which need high dexterity of prosthetist, are widely used. Lack of chartered and experienced prosthetist has often led to painful experience of wearing prosthesis and this will in turn deter the patients to wear the prosthesis, which will further aggravate stump shrinkage. Thus, the hydrostatic socket which demands relatively lower level of fabricating skill is proposed to replace the PTB socket in order to produce the equivalent, if not better, quality of support to the amputee patients. Both sockets' pressure profiles are studied and compared using finite element analysis (FEA) software. Three-dimensional models of both sockets were developed using MIMICS software. The analysis results showed that hydrostatic socket did exhibit more uniform pressure profiles than that of PTB socket. PTB socket showed pressure concentration near the proximal brim of the socket and also at the distal fibula. It was also found that the pressure magnitude in hydrostatic socket is relatively lower than that of PTB socket.
传统上,需要假肢师具备高度灵巧性的髌腱承重(PTB)接受腔被广泛使用。缺乏有资质和经验的假肢师常常导致患者佩戴假肢时产生痛苦体验,这反过来又会使患者不愿佩戴假肢,进而加剧残肢萎缩。因此,为了给截肢患者提供同等甚至更好的支撑质量,人们提出了对制作技能要求相对较低的流体静压接受腔来取代PTB接受腔。使用有限元分析(FEA)软件对两种接受腔的压力分布进行了研究和比较。使用MIMICS软件建立了两种接受腔的三维模型。分析结果表明,流体静压接受腔的压力分布确实比PTB接受腔更均匀。PTB接受腔在接受腔近端边缘附近以及腓骨远端显示出压力集中。还发现流体静压接受腔中的压力大小相对低于PTB接受腔。