Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2010 Dec;40(12):1943-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000772. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
Although guided self-help for depression and anxiety disorders has been examined in many studies, it is not clear whether it is equally effective as face-to-face treatments.MethodWe conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which the effects of guided self-help on depression and anxiety were compared directly with face-to-face psychotherapies for depression and anxiety disorders. A systematic search in bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane) resulted in 21 studies with 810 participants.
The overall effect size indicating the difference between guided self-help and face-to-face psychotherapy at post-test was d=-0.02, in favour of guided self-help. At follow-up (up to 1 year) no significant difference was found either. No significant difference was found between the drop-out rates in the two treatments formats.
It seems safe to conclude that guided self-help and face-to-face treatments can have comparable effects. It is time to start thinking about implementation in routine care.
虽然有许多研究已经检验了针对抑郁和焦虑障碍的指导性自助疗法,但尚不清楚它是否与面对面治疗同样有效。
我们对随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,其中直接比较了指导性自助疗法对抑郁和焦虑的效果与针对抑郁和焦虑障碍的面对面心理疗法。在文献数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Cochrane)中进行了系统检索,共纳入了 21 项研究,涉及 810 名参与者。
在治疗结束时(即后测),指示指导性自助疗法与面对面心理疗法之间差异的总体效应量为 d=-0.02,有利于指导性自助疗法。在随访期(最长 1 年)也未发现显著差异。两种治疗方式的脱落率之间也未发现显著差异。
似乎可以有把握地得出结论,指导性自助疗法和面对面治疗可能具有相当的效果。现在是时候开始考虑在常规护理中实施了。