University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Dec;26(8):705-23. doi: 10.1080/02643291003691106.
The present study examined whether equivalents of surface and phonological subtypes of developmental dyslexia could be found among a sample of 84 poor readers aged 9-12 years in Greece. Word reading latency was used as a measure of lexical skill, and nonword reading accuracy was used as a measure of nonlexical skill. A simple regression of word reading latencies on nonword reading accuracy scores was performed for 42 developing readers. A total of 2 poor readers with accurate nonword reading plus slow word reading relative to controls (equivalents of surface dyslexia) and 2 poor readers with inaccurate nonword reading plus fast accurate word reading relative to controls (equivalents of phonological dyslexia) were identified from amongst the sample of poor readers. Further testing of these 4 cases on measures of irregular-word and nonword spelling revealed additional evidence of a dissociation between lexical and nonlexical impairments. These results support the notion that dual-route models can be used to explore individual differences among dyslexic readers in transparent orthographic systems such as Greek. An attempt is also made to interpret the results in terms of a double deficit theory of dyslexia.
本研究考察了在希腊的 84 名 9-12 岁的阅读困难者样本中,是否能找到发展性阅读障碍的表面和语音亚型的等效物。单词阅读潜伏期被用作词汇技能的衡量标准,而无词阅读准确性被用作非词汇技能的衡量标准。对 42 名发展中的读者进行了单词阅读潜伏期与无词阅读准确性得分的简单回归。从阅读困难者样本中,共确定了 2 名阅读困难者,他们的无词阅读准确但单词阅读缓慢,相对于对照组(类似于表面性阅读障碍),以及 2 名阅读困难者的无词阅读不准确但单词阅读快速且准确,相对于对照组(类似于语音性阅读障碍)。对这 4 个案例进行的不规则词和无词拼写测试的进一步测试提供了词汇和非词汇损伤之间分离的额外证据。这些结果支持了双路径模型可用于探索透明正字法系统(如希腊语)中阅读困难者的个体差异的观点。还尝试根据阅读障碍的双重缺陷理论来解释结果。