Sommer Peter
London School of Economics and Political Science, Open University, UK.
Sci Justice. 2010 Mar;50(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2009.11.006.
Regulatory trends in forensic science point strongly to the need for exhaustive testing of all findings and tools. At the same time a number ofjurisdictions suggest ajudicial test for the admissibility of novel scientific evidence. But in fields such as computers and cellphones, the rate of change is faster than the normal times required for peer-reviewed publication. One route to admitting less-than-perfect findings from forensic science is via a reevaluation of the role of expert evidence and in particular pre-trial meetings between experts.
法医学的监管趋势强烈表明,需要对所有调查结果和工具进行详尽测试。与此同时,一些司法管辖区建议对新科学证据的可采性进行司法测试。但在计算机和手机等领域,变化速度比同行评审出版物所需的正常时间要快。让法医学中不那么完美的调查结果被采纳的一条途径是重新评估专家证据的作用,尤其是专家之间的审前会议。