Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jan;37(1):69-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02030.x.
This study explored the nature of the unprompted information that clinicians seek before making a treatment decision and whether this decision corresponded with the clinical parameters of the case. Interns, general practitioners (GP) and prosthodontists (n = 70, mean age 33 years, range 23-68) were presented with a written vignette of partial edentulism that included two spaces and were invited to ask any questions for the purpose of making a treatment recommendation. A list of 48 potential question/answer items was available to the interviewer, of which 38 were asked. These were then allotted to four thematic categories. Mean number of questions asked did not differ significantly amongst groups, although prosthodontists asked significantly more questions in the 'clinical and radiographic information' category than GPs (P = 0.0001) and interns (P = 0.003). The relationship between a prescribed treatment and questions asked was tested by dichotomizing all recommendations into 'possible' or 'not possible' based on the authors' knowledge of the actual case history. There were no significant differences amongst the groups in the frequency of prescribing 'possible' treatment (Pearson chi-square 0.083 and 0.108 for upper and lower spaces, respectively), but those who prescribed 'possible' treatment asked significantly more questions in the 'clinical and radiographic information' category, specifically about bone adequacy in the edentulous areas: upper jaw (P = 0.0001) and lower jaw (P = 0.003). It may be concluded that prosthodontists generally opted for more 'possible' treatments, as well as seeking items of information that seemed to improve the chance of making recommendations that conformed to the actual case characteristics.
本研究探讨了临床医生在做出治疗决策之前主动寻求的信息的性质,以及这些决策是否与病例的临床参数相符。实习生、全科医生(GP)和修复医生(n=70,平均年龄 33 岁,范围 23-68 岁)收到了一份部分缺牙的书面病例简介,并被邀请提出任何问题,以便提出治疗建议。采访者提供了一份包含 48 个潜在问题/答案的清单,其中 38 个问题被问到。然后,这些问题被分配到四个主题类别中。各组之间提出的问题数量没有显著差异,但修复医生在“临床和影像学信息”类别中提出的问题明显多于全科医生(P=0.0001)和实习生(P=0.003)。通过根据作者对实际病例史的了解,将所有建议分为“可能”或“不可能”,来检验规定的治疗方法与提出的问题之间的关系。在上颌和下颌空间中,分别使用 Pearson 卡方检验(0.083 和 0.108),各组在规定“可能”治疗的频率上没有显著差异,但那些规定“可能”治疗的人在“临床和影像学信息”类别中提出了更多的问题,特别是关于缺牙区域的骨量:上颌(P=0.0001)和下颌(P=0.003)。可以得出结论,修复医生通常更倾向于选择更多的“可能”治疗方案,同时也寻求一些信息,这些信息似乎可以提高与实际病例特征相符的建议的可能性。