Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box # 3270 (Davie Hall), Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Jul;48(7):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.021. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
Research has demonstrated that higher levels of religiosity are positively correlated with thought-action fusion (TAF), a set of cognitive biases found to be associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms. However, previous studies have exclusively relied on a nomothetic approach to measuring TAF using a single self-report instrument, the thought-action fusion scale. The current study examined the relationship between religiosity and TAF using an in vivo behaviorally-based assessment in which participants thought about and wrote down thoughts of negative events involving loved ones. Forty-three highly religious Protestant Christians were compared to 30 Atheists/Agnostics on their in vivo ratings of anxiety, estimates of likelihood, and moral wrongness related to the negative thoughts. Results indicated that compared to the non-religious participants, those who were highly religious believed that writing and thinking about the negative events was more morally wrong and increased the likelihood of the event. Results are discussed in terms of the potential relationship between certain religious teachings and TAF-related beliefs about the importance, significance, and influence of thoughts.
研究表明,更高的宗教信仰程度与思维-行动融合(TAF)呈正相关,思维-行动融合是一组与强迫症症状相关的认知偏差。然而,之前的研究仅依赖于使用单一的自我报告工具,即思维-行动融合量表,对 TAF 进行的理论研究方法。本研究使用基于行为的现场评估来检验宗教信仰与 TAF 之间的关系,参与者在现场思考并写下涉及亲人的负面事件的想法。将 43 名高度虔诚的新教基督徒与 30 名无神论者/不可知论者进行比较,比较他们对负面想法的焦虑现场评分、可能性估计和道德错误的相关程度。结果表明,与非宗教参与者相比,那些高度虔诚的人认为写和思考负面事件在道德上更错误,并增加了事件发生的可能性。研究结果从某些宗教教义与 TAF 相关的信念的角度,讨论了关于思想的重要性、意义和影响的潜在关系。