College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, 231 Arps Hall, 1945 N. High Street, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010 Oct;41(4):504-20. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0056). Epub 2010 Apr 26.
This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of teachers' use of a print-referencing style during whole-class read-alouds with respect to accelerating 4- and 5-year-old children's print-knowledge development. It also examined 8 specific child- and setting-level moderators to determine whether these influenced the relation between teachers' use of a print-referencing style and children's print-knowledge development.
In this randomized controlled trial, 59 teachers were randomly assigned to 2 conditions. Teachers in the experimental group (n = 31) integrated explicit references to specified print targets within each of 120 read-aloud sessions conducted in their classrooms over a 30-week period; comparison teachers (n = 28) read the same set of book titles along the same schedule but read using their business-as-usual reading style. Children's gains over the 30-week period on a composite measure of print knowledge were compared for a subset of children who were randomly selected from the experimental (n = 201) and comparison (n = 178) classrooms.
When controlling for fall print knowledge, child age, and classroom quality, children who experienced a print-referencing style of reading had significantly higher print knowledge scores in the spring than did children in the comparison classroom. None of the child-level (age, initial literacy skills, language ability) or setting-level characteristics (program type, instructional quality, average level of classroom socioeconomic status, teachers' education level, teachers' experience) significantly moderated intervention effects.
Considered in tandem with prior study findings concerning this approach to emergent literacy intervention, print-focused read-alouds appear to constitute an evidence-based practice with net positive impacts on children's literacy development.
本研究旨在确定教师在全班朗读时使用印刷参考样式对加速 4 至 5 岁儿童印刷知识发展的有效性。它还检查了 8 个特定的儿童和环境水平的调节因素,以确定这些因素是否影响教师使用印刷参考样式与儿童印刷知识发展之间的关系。
在这项随机对照试验中,将 59 名教师随机分配到 2 个条件中。实验组(n = 31)的教师在 30 周的时间内,在其课堂上进行的 120 次朗读课程中,每节课都融入了对特定印刷目标的明确引用;对照组教师(n = 28)按照相同的时间表阅读相同的书籍标题,但采用他们的常规阅读风格进行阅读。从实验组(n = 201)和对照组(n = 178)教室中随机选择的一组儿童,比较他们在 30 周期间在印刷知识综合测量上的收益。
当控制秋季印刷知识、儿童年龄和课堂质量时,经历印刷参考风格阅读的儿童在春季的印刷知识得分显著高于对照组儿童。儿童水平(年龄、初始读写技能、语言能力)或环境水平特征(项目类型、教学质量、课堂社会经济地位的平均水平、教师教育水平、教师经验)均无显著调节干预效果。
考虑到这种早期读写干预方法的先前研究结果,以印刷为重点的朗读似乎构成了一种基于证据的实践,对儿童的读写发展有积极的影响。