Juric Danijela, Mahovlić Vesna, Rajhvajn Sanda, Ovanin-Rakić Ana, Skopljanac-Macina Lada, Barisić Ana, Projić Ivana Samija, Babić Damir, Susa Martina, Corusić Ante, Oresković Slavko
Department of Gynecologic Cytology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34(1):19-24.
Liquid-based cytology (LBC) enables the use of supplementary methods in the diagnosis and prognosis of cervical lesions. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between p16-INK4a immunoexpression in ThinPrep cervical cytologic samples and human papillomavirus (HPV) detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the same sample. LBC-ThinPrep (Cytyc, USA) cervical cytology samples, prepared and stained by Papanicolaou method, were analyzed using modified Bethesda cytologic classification named "Zagreb 2002". A second ThinPrep slide, prepared from the same sample, was immunostained for p16INK4a using CINtec p16INK4a Cytology Kit (DakoCytomation, Denmark). Increased expression of the high-risk (HR) HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes results in a highly specific increase in p16 protein expression and overexpression of p16INK4a acts as a potential biomarker for cervical cancer progression from premalignant lesions. Brown nuclear and/or cytoplasmic staining of abnormal cells was considered a positive result. Residual material was used for 13 HR HPV-DNA detection by the PCR based AMPLICOR HPV test (Roche Molecular Systems). A total of 120 ThinPrep Pap tests with the following cytologic diagnoses: 17 within normal limits, 17 atypical squamous cell (ASC) (7 ASC of undetermined significance /ASCUS/ and 10 ASC of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cannot be excluded /ASC-H/), 26 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) corresponding cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 57 high-grade SIL (HSIL) i.e. 24 CIN II and 33 CIN III and 3 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were included in the study. All CIN III (n = 33) and SCC (n = 3) specimens expressed p16INK4a immunoreactivity, whereas the HR HPV test was positive in 97% (32/33) of CIN III and 100% (3/3) of SCC specimens. The p16INK4a biomarker was positive in 87.5% (21/24) of CIN II and 69% (18/26) of CIN I, while the HR HPV was positive in 75% (18/24) of CIN II and 50% (13/26) of CIN I. In ASCUS cytology, p16INK4a and HR HPV showed the same rate of positivity (28.5%; 2/7). Expression of p16INK4a was detected in all cytologic (10/10) ASC-H lesions, in contrast to HR HPV detected in only 20% (2/10) of ASC-H cases. These data suggest the p16INK4a evaluation in ThinPrep cervical samples to be significantly associated with HR HPV testing by PCR in the same sample for the diagnosis of HSIL lesions and cervical carcinomas. A prospective study with longer follow up may clarify the predictive values in the management of LSIL and ASC diagnosis.
液基细胞学检查(LBC)有助于在宫颈病变的诊断和预后评估中采用辅助方法。本研究的目的是分析ThinPrep宫颈细胞学样本中p16-INK4a免疫表达与同一样本聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)之间的相关性。采用巴氏染色法制备并染色的LBC-ThinPrep(美国Cytyc公司)宫颈细胞学样本,使用名为“萨格勒布2002”的改良贝塞斯达细胞学分类法进行分析。从同一样本制备的第二张ThinPrep玻片,使用CINtec p16INK4a细胞学试剂盒(丹麦DakoCytomation公司)进行p16INK4a免疫染色。高危(HR)HPV E6和E7癌基因表达增加会导致p16蛋白表达高度特异性增加,p16INK4a过表达可作为宫颈癌从癌前病变进展的潜在生物标志物。异常细胞出现棕色细胞核和/或细胞质染色被视为阳性结果。剩余样本用于基于PCR的AMPLICOR HPV检测(罗氏分子系统公司)检测13种HR HPV-DNA。共有120例ThinPrep巴氏试验,其细胞学诊断如下:17例正常,17例非典型鳞状细胞(ASC)(7例意义不明确的ASC/ASCUS/和10例不能排除高级别鳞状上皮内病变的ASC/ASC-H/),26例低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)相当于宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)1级,57例高级别SIL(HSIL)即24例CIN II级和33例CIN III级以及三例鳞状细胞癌(SCC)纳入本研究。所有CIN III级(n = 33)和SCC(n = 3)标本均表达p16INK4a免疫反应性,而HR HPV检测在97%(32/33)的CIN III级和100%(3/3)的SCC标本中呈阳性。p16INK4a生物标志物在87.5%(21/24)的CIN II级和69%(18/26)的CIN I级中呈阳性,而HR HPV在75%(18/24)的CIN II级和CIN I级的50%(13/26)中呈阳性。在ASCUS细胞学检查中,p16INK4a和HR HPV的阳性率相同(分别为28.5%;2/7)。在所有细胞学(10/10)ASC-H病变中均检测到p16INK4a表达,相比之下,仅在20%(2/10)的ASC-H病例中检测到HR HPV。这些数据表明,在ThinPrep宫颈样本中评估p16INK4a与同一样本通过PCR检测HR HPV在诊断HSIL病变和宫颈癌方面显著相关。一项随访时间更长的前瞻性研究可能会明确其在LSIL和ASC诊断管理中的预测价值。