Suppr超能文献

[奥尔堡医院的出版活动]

[Publication activity at Aalborg Hospital].

作者信息

Andersen Jens Peter, Skrubbeltrang Conni, Gregersen Hans

机构信息

Arhus Universitetshospital, Aalborg Sygehus, Afdelingen for Universitetshospitalsanliggender, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Apr 26;172(17):1279-84.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2003 Aalborg Hospital became part of Aarhus University Hospital and in that context focus on research activities was increased. This article investigates whether the increased focus has led to changes in the quantity and/or quality of research publications in the following period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All scientific articles published by Aalborg Hospital in the period 2002-2008, as well as information about author affiliations comprise the data material for the analysis. Different levels of journal groups are created based on Journal Performance Indicators combined with peer-reviewing as a measure of publication quality, awarding publications in highly esteemed journals a higher score than those published in less recognized journals. Together with the number of publications, a measure of research quality and quantity is thereby achieved. This method is compared to the more traditional journal impact factor method.

RESULTS

Data show an increase in total publications per year while the mean number of points per publication decreases during the period. Results also show a relation between the score level of publications and the number of collaborations for the publication, i.e. large collaborations are more frequently published in top journals.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that the increased focus on research has led to increased publication activity without loss of quality, as the decrease in points per publication is associated with the increased mean number of collaborators. The results indicate that the method would benefit from a revision to facilitate clearer conclusions.

摘要

引言

2003年,奥尔堡医院成为奥胡斯大学医院的一部分,在此背景下,对研究活动的关注度有所提高。本文调查了这种关注度的提高在接下来的时期内是否导致了研究出版物数量和/或质量的变化。

材料与方法

奥尔堡医院在2002 - 2008年期间发表的所有科学文章以及作者单位信息构成了分析的数据材料。基于期刊绩效指标并结合同行评审来衡量出版质量,创建不同级别的期刊组,给予在备受推崇的期刊上发表的文章比在知名度较低的期刊上发表的文章更高的分数。这样,连同出版物数量一起,就得到了一种研究质量和数量的衡量方法。该方法与更传统的期刊影响因子方法进行了比较。

结果

数据显示每年的出版物总数有所增加,而在此期间每篇出版物的平均分数下降。结果还表明出版物的分数水平与该出版物的合作数量之间存在关联,即大型合作更频繁地发表在顶级期刊上。

结论

该研究表明,对研究的关注度提高导致了出版活动的增加且质量并未下降,因为每篇出版物分数的下降与合作者平均数量的增加有关。结果表明该方法需要修订以得出更清晰的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验