Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.
Sports Biomech. 2010 Mar;9(1):57-64. doi: 10.1080/14763141003690237.
The recent popularization and technological improvements of synthetic or artificial ice surfaces provide an attractive alternative to real ice in venues where the latter is impractical to install. Potentially, synthetic ice (SI) may be installed in controlled laboratory settings to permit detailed biomechanical analysis of skating manoeuvres. Unknown, however, is the extent to which skating on SI replicates skating on traditional ice (ICE). Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare kinetic and kinematic forward skating parameters between SI and ICE surfaces. With 11 male hockey players, a portable strain gauge system adhered to the outside of the skate blade holder was used to measure skate propulsive force synchronized with electrogoniometers for tracking dynamic knee and ankle movements during forward skating acceleration. In general, the kinetic and kinematic variables investigated in this study showed minimal differences between the two surfaces (P > 0.06), and no individual variable differences were identified between the two surfaces (P > or = 0.1) with the exception of greater knee extension on SI than ICE (15.2 degrees to 11.0 degrees; P < or = 0.05). Overall, SI surfaces permit comparable mechanics for on-ice forward skating, and thus offer the potential for valid analogous conditions for in-lab testing and training.
最近,合成或人工冰面的普及和技术改进为那些不适合安装真冰的场所提供了一种有吸引力的替代方案。潜在地,合成冰(SI)可以安装在受控的实验室环境中,以允许对滑冰动作进行详细的生物力学分析。然而,在 SI 上滑冰在多大程度上复制了在传统冰(ICE)上滑冰尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是比较 SI 和 ICE 表面上的向前滑行动力学和运动学参数。在 11 名男性曲棍球运动员中,使用便携式应变计系统贴合在冰刀架的外侧,以测量与跟踪动态膝关节和踝关节运动的电子测角计同步的冰刀推进力,以进行向前滑冰加速。一般来说,本研究中研究的动力学和运动学变量在两个表面之间显示出最小的差异(P > 0.06),并且在两个表面之间没有发现个别变量差异(P >或= 0.1),除了在 SI 上的膝关节伸展更大比 ICE(15.2 度到 11.0 度;P <或= 0.05)。总体而言,SI 表面允许进行类似的冰上向前滑行力学,因此为实验室测试和训练提供了类似的有效条件的潜力。