Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Feb;35(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02071.x.
Oral cancer leads to a considerable use of and expenditure on health care. Wide resection of the tumour and reconstruction with a pedicle flap/free flap is widely used. This study was conducted to explore the relationship between hospitalisation costs and surgeon case volume when this operation was performed.
A population-based study.
This study uses data for the years 2005-2006 obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database published in the Taiwanese National Health Research Institute.
From this population-based data, the authors selected a total of 2663 oral cancer patients who underwent tumour resection and reconstruction.
Case volume relationships were based on the following criteria; low-, medium-, high-, very high-volume surgeons were defined by <or= 9, 10-29, 30-55, >or= 56 resections with reconstruction, respectively. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was subsequently performed to explore the relationship between surgeon case volume and the cost and length of hospitalisation.
The mean hospitalisation cost among the 2663 patients was US$ 9528 (all costs are given in US dollars). After adjusting for physician, hospital, and patient characteristics in a hierarchical linear regression model, the cost per patient for low-volume surgeons was found to be US$ 741 (P = 0.012) higher than that for medium-volume surgeons, US$ 1546 (P < 0.001) higher than that for high-volume surgeons, and US$ 1820 (P < 0.001) higher than that for very-high-volume surgeons. After adjustment for physician, hospital, and patient characteristics, the hierarchical linear regression model revealed that the mean length of stay per patient for low-volume surgeons was the highest (P < 0.001).
After adjustment for physician, hospital, and patient characteristics, low-volume surgeons performing wide excision with reconstructive surgery in oral cancer patients incurred significantly higher costs and longer hospital stays per patient than did other surgeons. Treatment strategies adopted by high- and very-high-volume surgeons should be analysed further and utilised more widely.
口腔癌导致大量医疗保健的使用和支出。广泛切除肿瘤并使用带蒂皮瓣/游离皮瓣重建是广泛使用的方法。本研究旨在探讨在进行该手术时,住院费用与外科医生手术量之间的关系。
基于人群的研究。
本研究使用 2005-2006 年台湾国家健康研究所公布的国家健康保险研究数据库的数据。
从这个基于人群的数据中,作者共选择了 2663 名接受肿瘤切除和重建的口腔癌患者。
病例量关系基于以下标准;低、中、高、超高量外科医生分别定义为 <或= 9、10-29、30-55、>或= 56 例带重建的手术。随后进行分层线性回归分析,以探讨外科医生手术量与住院费用和住院时间的关系。
2663 例患者的平均住院费用为 9528 美元(所有费用均以美元计)。在分层线性回归模型中,调整医生、医院和患者特征后,低量外科医生每位患者的费用比中量外科医生高 741 美元(P = 0.012),比高量外科医生高 1546 美元(P < 0.001),比超高量外科医生高 1820 美元(P < 0.001)。在调整医生、医院和患者特征后,分层线性回归模型显示低量外科医生每位患者的平均住院时间最长(P < 0.001)。
在调整医生、医院和患者特征后,低量外科医生在口腔癌患者中进行广泛切除和重建手术的每位患者的费用和住院时间明显高于其他外科医生。应进一步分析高量和超高量外科医生采用的治疗策略,并更广泛地应用。