State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Dec;38(6):773-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.03.036. Epub 2010 May 6.
We have tested the hypothesis that epicardial implantation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) system during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be an additional treatment method, which can decrease the mortality and improve left ventricle (LV) systolic function in patients with ischaemic heart failure (HF) and LV dyssynchrony.
One hundred and seventy-eight consecutive patients with severe ischaemic HF and LV dyssynchrony were enrolled in two groups: CABG alone (n=87) and epicardial CRT implantation during CABG (n=91). The primary end point of the study was the comparison of mortality between two groups at 18 months of follow-up.
Twenty-three patients (26.1%) in the CABG group died at 18 months of follow-up compared with nine (10%) in CABG+CRT group (log-rank test, p=0.006). The Cox regression analysis revealed that LV dyssynchrony (hazard ratio (HR) 2.634 (1.206-5.751), p=0.015) was the independent predictor of all-cause death and HF hospitalisation. LV systolic function, dyssynchrony signs and quality of life did not change significantly post-CABG compared to pre-CABG data in CABG group patients. On the contrary, echocardiography revealed an improved LV ejection fraction (42±1.9 vs 28±2.7; p<0.001), smaller LV end-systolic volume (120±57.5 vs 164±61.4; p=0.04) and improved LV synchrony in the CABG+CRT group compared with the CABG group. In the CABG+CRT group, more patients improved by two NYHA classes (NYHA, New York Heart Association; 49 vs 0; p=0.028), had a longer 6-min-walk test distance (452±65 vs 289±72; p<0.001) and a better quality of life (22.9±5 vs 46.4±11; p<0.001) compared with the CABG group.
For majority of the patients with ischaemic HF and evidence of LV dyssynchrony, CABG neither eliminates dyssynchrony nor improves systolic function. Epicardial implantation of a CRT system concomitant with CABG facilitates patient management in the early postoperative period, improves LV systolic function and quality of life and is associated with low mortality at 18 months of follow-up.
我们检验了这样一个假设,即在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)期间进行心脏再同步治疗(CRT)系统的心外膜植入可能是一种额外的治疗方法,可以降低死亡率并改善缺血性心力衰竭(HF)和左心室(LV)不同步患者的左心室收缩功能。
将 178 例严重缺血性 HF 和 LV 不同步的连续患者分为两组:单纯 CABG 组(n=87)和 CABG 期间心外膜 CRT 植入组(n=91)。研究的主要终点是两组在 18 个月随访时的死亡率比较。
CABG 组有 23 例(26.1%)患者在 18 个月的随访中死亡,而 CABG+CRT 组有 9 例(10%)(对数秩检验,p=0.006)。Cox 回归分析显示,LV 不同步(风险比(HR)2.634(1.206-5.751),p=0.015)是全因死亡和 HF 住院的独立预测因子。与 CABG 组患者 CABG 前的数据相比,CABG 组患者 CABG 后 LV 收缩功能、不同步征象和生活质量无明显变化。相反,与 CABG 组相比,CABG+CRT 组的超声心动图显示 LV 射血分数改善(42±1.9 对 28±2.7;p<0.001),LV 收缩末期容积减小(120±57.5 对 164±61.4;p=0.04),LV 同步性改善。在 CABG+CRT 组中,与 CABG 组相比,更多的患者 NYHA 分级改善两级(NYHA,纽约心脏协会;49 对 0;p=0.028),6 分钟步行试验距离更长(452±65 对 289±72;p<0.001),生活质量更好(22.9±5 对 46.4±11;p<0.001)。
对于大多数缺血性 HF 合并 LV 不同步证据的患者,CABG 既不能消除不同步,也不能改善收缩功能。CABG 同期进行心外膜 CRT 系统植入有助于患者术后早期管理,改善 LV 收缩功能和生活质量,并与 18 个月随访时的低死亡率相关。