Hasnain-Wynia Romana, Kang Raymond, Landrum Mary Beth, Vogeli Christine, Baker David W, Weissman Joel S
Center for Healthcare Equity, Institute for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611-3152, USA.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 May;21(2):629-48. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0281.
Little is known about whether disparities occur within or between hospitals for national Hospital Quality Alliance (HQA) measures.
We examined patient-level data from 4,450 non-federal hospitals in the U.S. for over 2.3 million Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander patients who received care for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia in 2005.
There were 37 out of 95 findings of disparities after adjusting for patient characteristics. Eleven of the disparities were explained entirely by where minorities received care and the magnitude for 25 of the others was substantially reduced after adjusting for site of care.
Adjusting for between-hospital quality differences accounted for a large proportion of the disparities. Where disparities exist, the primary cause may be that minorities are more likely to receive care in lower-performing hospitals. Policies to reduce disparities should include targeting resources to facilities serving a high percentage of minority patients.
关于国家医院质量联盟(HQA)指标在医院内部或医院之间是否存在差异,目前所知甚少。
我们研究了美国4450家非联邦医院的患者层面数据,这些数据涉及2005年因急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭或肺炎接受治疗的超过230万黑人、西班牙裔、亚裔、美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民以及夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民患者。
在对患者特征进行调整后,95项研究结果中有37项存在差异。其中11项差异完全由少数族裔接受治疗的地点所解释,在对治疗地点进行调整后,其他25项差异的程度大幅降低。
对医院间质量差异进行调整后,差异的很大一部分得到了解释。在存在差异的地方,主要原因可能是少数族裔更有可能在绩效较低的医院接受治疗。减少差异的政策应包括将资源投向服务少数族裔患者比例较高的机构。