Department of Psychiatry, Mood & Anxiety Clinic at Mood Disorders Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;64(3):336-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02284.x.
To study mood stabiliser treatment in patients with bipolar disorder with or without anxiety disorders (ADs) and/or substance use disorders (SUDs).
Extensive clinical interview and Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview were used to ascertain DSM-IV diagnoses of rapid cycling bipolar I (RCBDI) or II (RCBDII), SUDs and ADs. Previous treatment statuses with a mood stabiliser after the first onset of mania/hypomania (unmedicated, mismedicated and correctly medicated) were retrospectively determined in patients enrolled into four similar clinical trials. T-test and chi-square/Fisher's exact were used wherever appropriate.
Of 566 patients (RCBDI n = 320, RCBDII n = 246), 46% had any lifetime AD, 67% had any lifetime SUD and 40% had any recent SUD. Overall, 12% of patients were unmedicated, 37% were mismedicated at the onset of first mania/hypomania and 51% were correctly medicated. Presence of lifetime ADs and recent SUDs was associated with fewer mood stabiliser treatments. Patients with RCBDI were more likely correctly medicated than those with RCBDII (OR = 3.64) regardless of the presence (OR = 2.6) or absence (OR = 4.2) of ADs, or the presence (OR = 2.8) or absence (OR = 3.13) of recent SUDs. Presence of lifetime ADs and recent SUDs increased the risk for mismedicated in RCBDI with odds ratios of 1.8 and 1.9, respectively, but not in RCBDII.
In this multi-morbid cohort of patients with RCBD, 51% of patients (64% of RCBDI and 33% with RCDBII) were correctly medicated with a mood stabiliser after the onset of first mania/hypomania. The presence of ADs and SUDs was associated with an increased risk of mismedicated in patients with RCBDI, but not with RCBDII.
研究伴有或不伴有焦虑障碍(AD)和/或物质使用障碍(SUD)的双相障碍患者的心境稳定剂治疗情况。
采用广泛的临床访谈和 Mini-国际神经精神访谈,确定 DSM-IV 快速循环双相 I 型(RCBDI)或 II 型(RCBDII)、SUD 和 AD 的诊断。在四项类似的临床试验中,回顾性确定了首次躁狂/轻躁狂发作后(未治疗、错配治疗和正确治疗)使用心境稳定剂的既往治疗情况。适当情况下使用 t 检验和卡方/Fisher 精确检验。
在 566 名患者(RCBDI n = 320,RCBDII n = 246)中,46%有终生 AD,67%有终生 SUD,40%有近期 SUD。总体而言,12%的患者未治疗,37%的患者在首次躁狂/轻躁狂发作时错配治疗,51%的患者正确治疗。终生 AD 和近期 SUD 的存在与较少的心境稳定剂治疗有关。RCBDI 患者比 RCBDII 患者更有可能得到正确治疗(OR = 3.64),无论是否存在 AD(OR = 2.6)或不存在 AD(OR = 4.2),或是否存在近期 SUD(OR = 2.8)或不存在近期 SUD(OR = 3.13)。终生 AD 和近期 SUD 的存在分别使 RCBDI 中错配治疗的风险增加 1.8 和 1.9 倍,但对 RCBDII 没有影响。
在这一多疾病的 RCBD 患者队列中,51%的患者(64%的 RCBDI 和 33%的 RCBDII)在首次躁狂/轻躁狂发作后接受心境稳定剂的正确治疗。AD 和 SUD 的存在与 RCBDI 患者错配治疗的风险增加有关,但与 RCBDII 无关。