Department of Clinical Virology, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
J Viral Hepat. 2011 May;18(5):338-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01314.x.
The relationship of inhibitory quotient (IQ) with the virologic response to specific inhibitors of human hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the best method to correct for serum protein binding in calculating IQ have not been addressed. A common method is to determine a fold shift by comparing the EC(50) values determined in cell culture in the absence and presence of human serum (fold shift in EC(50) ), but this method has a number of disadvantages. In the present study, the fold shifts in drug concentrations between 100% human plasma (HP) and cell culture medium (CCM) were directly measured using a modified comparative equilibrium dialysis (CED) assay for three HCV protease inhibitors (PIs) and for a novel HCV inhibitor GS-9132. The fold shift values in drug concentration between the HP and CCM (CED ratio) were ∼1 for SCH-503034, VX-950 and GS-9132 and 13 for BILN-2061. These values were ∼3-10-fold lower than the fold shift values calculated from the EC(50) assay for all inhibitors except BILN-2061. Using the CED values, a consistent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship was observed for the four HCV inhibitors analysed. Specifically, an approximate 1 log(10) reduction in HCV RNA was achieved with an IQ close to 1, while 2-3 and greater log(10) reductions in HCV RNA were achieved with IQ values of 3-5 and greater, respectively. Thus, use of CED to define IQ provides a predictive and quantitative approach for the assessment of the in vivo potency of HCV PIs and GS-9132. This method provides a framework for the evaluation of other classes of drugs that are bound by serum proteins but require the presence of serum for in vitro evaluation.
抑制率(IQ)与特定人丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抑制剂的病毒学反应之间的关系,以及计算 IQ 时校正血清蛋白结合的最佳方法尚未得到解决。一种常用的方法是通过比较无血清和有血清存在时细胞培养中 EC(50)值来确定倍数变化(EC(50)的倍数变化),但这种方法有许多缺点。在本研究中,使用改良的比较平衡透析(CED)测定法直接测量了三种 HCV 蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)和一种新型 HCV 抑制剂 GS-9132 在 100%人血浆(HP)和细胞培养基(CCM)之间药物浓度的倍数变化。药物浓度在 HP 和 CCM 之间的倍数变化(CED 比)约为 1 对于 SCH-503034、VX-950 和 GS-9132,而对于 BILN-2061 则为 13。除了 BILN-2061 以外,这些值约为所有抑制剂 EC(50)测定法计算出的倍数变化值的 3-10 倍。使用 CED 值,对四种 HCV 抑制剂进行了一致的药代动力学和药效学关系分析。具体来说,当 IQ 接近 1 时,HCV RNA 约降低 1 个对数(10),而当 IQ 值分别为 3-5 和更高时,HCV RNA 降低 2-3 个和更高个对数。因此,使用 CED 定义 IQ 为评估 HCV PI 和 GS-9132 的体内效力提供了一种预测性和定量方法。该方法为评估其他类别的药物提供了一个框架,这些药物被血清蛋白结合,但需要血清存在才能进行体外评估。