Division of General Internal Medicine, 325 Ninth Avenue, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun;17(6):752-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.010.
The US Mammography Quality Standards Act mandates medical audits to track breast cancer outcomes data associated with interpretive performance. The objectives of our study were to assess the content and style of audits and examine use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of the value that radiologists' have regarding mandated medical audits.
Radiologists (n = 364) at mammography registries in seven US states contributing data to the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) were invited to participate. We examined radiologists' demographic characteristics, clinical experience, use, attitudes, and perceived value of audit reports from results of a self-administered survey. Information on the content and style of BCSC audits provided to radiologists and facilities was obtained from site investigators. Radiologists' characteristics were analyzed according to whether or not they self-reported receiving regular mammography audit reports. Latent class analysis was used to classify radiologists' individual perceptions of audit reports into overall probabilities of having "favorable," "less favorable," "neutral," or "unfavorable" attitudes toward audit reports.
Seventy-one percent (257 of 364) of radiologists completed the survey; two radiologists did not complete the audit survey question, leaving 255 for the final study cohort. Most survey respondents received regular audits (91%), paid close attention to their audit numbers (83%), found the reports valuable (87%), and felt that audit reports prompted them to improve interpretative performance (75%). Variability was noted in the style, target audience, and frequency of reports provided by the BCSC registries. One in four radiologists reported that if Congress mandates more intensive auditing requirements, but does not provide funding to support this regulation they may stop interpreting mammograms.
Radiologists working in breast imaging generally had favorable opinions of audit reports, which were mandated by Congress; however, almost 1 in 10 radiologists reported that they did not receive audits.
美国乳腺摄影质量标准法案要求进行医学审核,以跟踪与解读性能相关的乳腺癌结果数据。我们研究的目的是评估审核的内容和形式,并研究放射科医生对强制性医学审核的使用、态度和看法。
邀请参与美国七个州的乳腺摄影注册处的乳腺摄影登记处的放射科医生(n=364)参加。我们检查了放射科医生的人口统计学特征、临床经验、使用情况、对审核报告的态度以及对其价值的看法,这些信息来自于他们对自我管理调查结果的反馈。从乳腺摄影登记处调查员处获得有关 BCSC 审核的内容和形式的信息。根据他们是否报告定期收到乳腺摄影审核报告,分析放射科医生的特征。使用潜在类别分析将放射科医生对审核报告的个人看法分为对审核报告的总体看法,分为“有利”、“不太有利”、“中立”或“不利”。
71%(364 名中的 257 名)的放射科医生完成了调查;两名放射科医生未完成审核调查问题,最终研究队列中剩余 255 名。大多数调查受访者定期接受审核(91%),密切关注审核数据(83%),认为报告有价值(87%),并认为审核报告促使他们提高解读表现(75%)。BCSC 登记处提供的报告的风格、目标受众和频率存在差异。四分之一的放射科医生报告说,如果国会强制要求更严格的审核要求,但不提供资金支持这一规定,他们可能会停止解读乳房 X 光片。
在乳房成像领域工作的放射科医生普遍对国会授权的审核报告持有利意见;然而,近十分之一的放射科医生报告说他们没有收到审核。