Department of Medical Humanities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27834, USA.
Account Res. 2010 May;17(3):115-29. doi: 10.1080/08989621003791929.
Despite the growing emphasis placed on the responsible conduct of research, little attention has been devoted to the question of what an individual should do upon discovering research misconduct. This article takes seriously the dilemma of a would-be whistleblower. It identifies ethical considerations that can be taken into account in moral decision-making about reporting research misconduct. It also offers rough guidelines about the moral significance of each consideration in the decision-making process based on the facts of the case in question. The article, therefore, offers tools for a would-be whistleblower to use to arrive at a defensible resolution to a difficult dilemma.
尽管越来越重视负责任的研究行为,但很少有人关注发现研究不端行为后个人应该做什么的问题。本文认真对待潜在举报人的困境。它确定了在报告研究不端行为的道德决策中可以考虑的伦理考虑因素。它还根据具体案例的事实,为决策过程中对每个考虑因素的道德意义提供了大致的指导方针。因此,本文为潜在举报人提供了一些工具,帮助他们做出有说服力的决定,以解决困难的困境。