Faculté d'Administration, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
J Psychol. 2010 May-Jun;144(3):285-312. doi: 10.1080/00223981003648302.
Research on the 3-component model of organizational commitment--affective, normative, and continuance--has suggested that continuance commitment comprises 2 subcomponents, perceived lack of alternatives and sacrifice (e.g., S. J. Jaros, 1997; G. W. McGee & R. C. Ford, 1987). The authors aimed to extend that research in the context of employees' commitment to their immediate supervisors. Through two studies, they examined the validity and consequences of a 4-factor model of commitment to supervisors including affective, normative, continuance-alternatives, and continuance-sacrifice components. Study 1 (N = 317) revealed that the 4 components of commitment to supervisors were distinguishable from the corresponding components of organizational commitment. Study 2 (N = 240) further showed that the 4 components of commitment to supervisors differentially related to intention to leave the supervisor, supervisor-directed negative affect and emotional exhaustion. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for the management of employee commitment in organizations.
组织承诺的三成分模型——情感、规范和持续——表明持续承诺包括两个子成分,即感知到的缺乏替代选择和牺牲(例如,S. J. Jaros,1997;G. W. McGee & R. C. Ford,1987)。作者旨在在员工对直接主管的承诺背景下扩展这一研究。通过两项研究,他们检验了包括情感、规范、持续替代和持续牺牲成分在内的主管承诺的四因素模型的有效性和后果。研究 1(N=317)表明,主管承诺的四个成分与组织承诺的相应成分是可区分的。研究 2(N=240)进一步表明,主管承诺的四个成分与离开主管的意图、主管指向的消极情绪和情绪疲惫有不同的关系。作者讨论了这些发现对组织中员工承诺管理的意义。