Scientists' turn to win votes.
出版信息
Nature. 2010 May 13;465(7295):135. doi: 10.1038/465135a.
DOI:10.1038/465135a
PMID:20463693
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scientists' turn to win votes.
Nature. 2010 May 13;465(7295):135. doi: 10.1038/465135a.
2
Planning for US science policy in 2009.
Nature. 2006 Oct 19;443(7113):751-2. doi: 10.1038/443751a.
3
US scientists protest cuts to research funding that aim to reduce national deficit.
BMJ. 2012 Nov 28;345:e8101. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8101.
4
Italian election leaves science out in the cold.
Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):411-412. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-02223-7.
5
UK scientists fear further cuts.
Nature. 2013 Jun 13;498(7453):151. doi: 10.1038/498151a.
6
What Boris Johnson's leadership could mean for science.
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7767):13-14. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02279-z.
7
Communication breakdown.
Nature. 2015 Apr 2;520(7545):5. doi: 10.1038/520005a.
8
Australian scientists protest at loss of funding board.
Nature. 2005 Jul 28;436(7050):451. doi: 10.1038/436451b.
9
UK election: Upstart parties set out science plans.
Nature. 2015 Apr 2;520(7545):16-7. doi: 10.1038/520016a.
10
Science and innovation policies for Donald Trump.
Nature. 2016 Nov 17;539(7629):331. doi: 10.1038/539331a.
引用本文的文献
1
UK scientific societies need support to increase their impact.
Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):685. doi: 10.1038/465685a.
Zotero 插件