Division of Cardiology, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Nov;21(11):1202-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01796.x.
Intracardiac Echocardiography Guided Cryoballoon Ablation.
Cryoballoon ablation is increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This new technique aims to perform PVI safer and faster. However, procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar to conventional RF approaches. We compared ICE plus fluoroscopy versus fluoroscopy alone for anatomical guidance of PVI.
Forty-three consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned to ICE plus fluoroscopy (n = 22) versus fluoroscopy alone (n = 21) for guidance of cryoballoon PVI. A "single big balloon" procedure using a 28 mm cryoballoon was performed. The optimal ICE-guided position of the cryoballoon was assessed by full ostial occlusion and loss of Doppler coded reflow to the left atrium (LA). Any further freezes were ICE-guided only without use of fluoroscopy or contrast media injection.
A total of 171 pulmonary veins could be visualized with ICE. 80% of ICE-guided freezes were performed with excellent ICE quality. Acute procedural success and AF recurrence rate at 6 months were similar in both groups (AF recurrence: ICE-guided = 27% vs Fluoroscopy = 33%; P = ns). Patients without ICE guidance had significantly longer procedure (143 ± 27 minutes vs 130 ± 19 minutes; P = 0.05) and fluoroscopy times (42 ± 13 minutes vs 26 ± 10, P = 0.01). The total amount of contrast used during the procedure was significantly lower in patients with ICE guidance (88 ± 31 mL vs 169 ± 38 mL, P < 0.001).
Additional ICE guidance appears to be associated with lower fluoroscopy, contrast, and procedure times, with similar efficacy rates. Specifically, ICE allows for better identification of the PV LA junction and more precise anatomically guided cryoballoon ablations.
心内超声引导下冷冻球囊消融。
冷冻球囊消融术在心房颤动(AF)患者的肺静脉隔离(PVI)中应用越来越广泛。这项新技术旨在更安全、更快地进行 PVI。然而,与传统射频方法相比,手术和透视时间相似。我们比较了 ICE 加透视与单纯透视在 PVI 的解剖学引导中的作用。
43 例阵发性 AF 患者连续随机分为 ICE 加透视组(n = 22)和单纯透视组(n = 21),行冷冻球囊 PVI。使用 28mm 冷冻球囊进行“单个大球囊”程序。通过完全口部闭塞和左心房(LA)内多普勒编码反流的丧失来评估 ICE 引导下冷冻球囊的最佳位置。任何进一步的冷冻均仅在 ICE 引导下进行,不使用透视或造影剂注射。
共可在 ICE 下可视化 171 条肺静脉。80%的 ICE 引导冷冻具有良好的 ICE 质量。两组间急性手术成功率和 6 个月时 AF 复发率相似(AF 复发:ICE 引导组 = 27% vs 透视组 = 33%;P = ns)。无 ICE 引导的患者手术时间(143 ± 27 分钟比 130 ± 19 分钟;P = 0.05)和透视时间(42 ± 13 分钟比 26 ± 10 分钟;P = 0.01)明显延长。有 ICE 引导的患者术中造影剂用量明显减少(88 ± 31 mL 比 169 ± 38 mL,P < 0.001)。
附加 ICE 引导似乎与较低的透视、造影剂和手术时间相关,而疗效率相似。具体来说,ICE 可更好地识别 PV-LA 连接,并进行更精确的解剖引导冷冻球囊消融。