Suppr超能文献

对 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中与儿童相关的系统评价的描述性分析。

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

机构信息

Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2010 May 20;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-34.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence available in SRs and gaps in the evidence base where SRs are required. The objective of this study was to describe child-relevant SRs from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, Issue 2, 2009).

METHODS

SRs were assessed for relevance using pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and entered into an electronic form. Univariate analyses were performed to describe the SRs overall and by topic area.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1666 SRs; 793 met the inclusion criteria. 38% of SRs were last assessed as up-to-date prior to 2007. Corresponding authors were most often from the UK (41%). Most SRs (59%) examined pharmacological interventions. 53% had at least one external source of funding. SRs included a median of 7 studies (IQR 3, 15) and 679 participants (IQR 179, 2833). Of all studies, 48% included only children, and 27% only adults. 94% of studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Primary outcomes were specified in 72% of SRs. Allocation concealment and the Jadad scale were used in 97% and 25% of SRs, respectively. Adults and children were analyzed separately in 12% of SRs and as a subgroup analysis in 14%. Publication bias was assessed in only 14% of SRs. A meta-analysis was conducted in 68% of SRs with a median of 5 trials (IQR 3, 9) each. Variations in these characteristics were observed across topic areas.

CONCLUSIONS

We described the methodological characteristics and rigour of child-relevant reviews in the CDSR. Many SRs are not up-to-date according to Cochrane criteria. Our study describes variation in conduct and reporting across SRs and reveals clinicians' ability to access child-specific data.

摘要

背景

系统评价(SRs)被认为是决策的重要工具。最近没有对与儿童相关的 SRs 进行全面的识别或描述。对现有的与儿童相关的 SRs 进行描述,有助于确定 SRs 中现有的与儿童相关证据的范围以及需要 SRs 的证据基础中的差距。本研究的目的是描述 2009 年 Cochrane 系统评价数据库(CDSR,第 2 期)中的与儿童相关的 SRs。

方法

使用预先定义的标准评估 SRs 的相关性。提取数据并输入电子表格。进行单变量分析以描述总体和按主题领域的 SRs。

结果

搜索产生了 1666 篇 SRs;793 篇符合纳入标准。38%的 SRs 最后一次评估是在 2007 年之前的更新。通讯作者大多来自英国(41%)。大多数 SRs(59%)检查了药理学干预措施。53%至少有一个外部资金来源。SRs 包括中位数为 7 项研究(IQR 3,15)和 679 名参与者(IQR 179,2833)。所有研究中,48%仅包括儿童,27%仅包括成人。94%的研究发表在同行评议的期刊上。72%的 SRs 指定了主要结局。97%的 SRs 使用了分配隐藏,25%的 SRs 使用了 Jadad 量表。12%的 SRs 将成人和儿童分别进行分析,14%的 SRs 将其作为亚组分析。只有 14%的 SRs评估了发表偏倚。68%的 SRs 进行了荟萃分析,中位数为 5 项试验(IQR 3,9)。在不同主题领域观察到这些特征的变化。

结论

我们描述了 CDSR 中与儿童相关的综述的方法学特征和严谨性。许多 SRs 根据 Cochrane 标准并非最新。我们的研究描述了 SRs 之间的实施和报告差异,并揭示了临床医生获取儿童特定数据的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed65/2881081/fbc0c7a275ce/1471-2431-10-34-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验