Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2011 Jan;75(1):61-5. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0288-1. Epub 2010 May 19.
Recent studies reported converging evidence for action-effect associations if participants adopted an intention-based action control mode in free choice conditions, whereas no evidence for action-effect associations was found when participants adopted a stimulus-based mode in forced choice conditions. However, it is not yet clear whether action control modes moderate acquisition or usage of action-effect associations. In the present experiment, two groups of participants underwent an acquisition phase consisting of either free or forced choice key presses that produced irrelevant, but contingent effect tones. In a subsequent test phase, participants freely chose the key to press after former effect tones were presented. A reliable consistency effect resulted for both the groups, i.e. participants preferred the key that produced the irrelevant tone in the preceding acquisition phase. In combination with prior findings, this consistency effect suggests that usage, but not acquisition of action-effect associations depends on an intention-based action control mode.
最近的研究报告表明,如果参与者在自由选择条件下采用基于意图的动作控制模式,那么就会出现动作-效果关联的汇聚证据;而当参与者在强制选择条件下采用基于刺激的模式时,则没有发现动作-效果关联的证据。然而,目前尚不清楚动作控制模式是否会调节动作-效果关联的习得或使用。在本实验中,两组参与者分别经历了一个习得阶段,包括自由或强制选择按键,这些按键会产生无关但有条件的效果音。在随后的测试阶段,参与者在呈现先前的效果音后自由选择要按下的键。对于这两个组,都产生了可靠的一致性效应,即参与者更喜欢在前一个习得阶段产生无关音的键。结合先前的发现,这种一致性效应表明,动作-效果关联的使用,而不是习得,取决于基于意图的动作控制模式。