Or Charles C-F, Wilson Hugh R
Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3.
Vision Res. 2010 Jul 21;50(16):1581-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.016. Epub 2010 May 21.
Previous research has suggested that an object's category is retrieved as soon as it is detected (Grill-Spector & Kanwisher, 2005). Here we examined whether face views and identities are likewise treated as categories. We measured behavioural performance on three tasks: face detection, recognition of face view within identity, and within-view face identification, by using the method of constant stimuli combined with a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm. Stimulus duration was varied between 13 ms and 133 ms in order to estimate the time required for 75%-correct discrimination in each task. The results showed, respectively, 24- and 31-ms shorter threshold durations for face detection than for viewpoint recognition and face identification, while similar threshold durations for viewpoint recognition and face identification. We demonstrated that face view and identity are retrieved after face detection, and importantly, the view-based categorical analysis takes almost as long as the face identification process. Thus, additional processing is essential for viewpoint and identity extraction as opposed to face detection.
先前的研究表明,物体一旦被检测到,其类别就会被检索出来(Grill-Spector & Kanwisher,2005)。在此,我们研究了面部视图和身份是否同样被视为类别。我们通过使用恒定刺激法结合二选一强制选择(2AFC)范式,测量了在三项任务中的行为表现:面部检测、身份内面部视图识别和视图内面部识别。刺激持续时间在13毫秒至133毫秒之间变化,以估计每项任务中达到75%正确辨别所需的时间。结果显示,面部检测的阈值持续时间分别比视图识别和面部识别短24毫秒和31毫秒,而视图识别和面部识别的阈值持续时间相似。我们证明,面部视图和身份是在面部检测之后被检索出来的,重要的是,基于视图的类别分析所需时间几乎与面部识别过程相同。因此,与面部检测相反,额外的处理对于视图和身份提取至关重要。