Medical Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):386-94.
Pancreatic cancer is a malignancy with a very poor prognosis, even when radically resected. In advanced disease chemotherapy has a role in terms of clinical benefit and symptoms palliation, more than survival advantage. Gemcitabine as a single agent is the first-line standard treatment since 1997. Several trials failed to demonstrate a survival advantage of chemotherapy doublets or gemcitabine combined with biological agents versus gemcitabine alone in phase III trials. Erlotinib was the only agent to produce a statistically significant improvement of survival when combined with gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone. Nevertheless, the clinical application of these literature data remains controversial. However, a meta-analysis showed that combination chemotherapy is superior to gemcitabine alone in terms of survival and clinical benefit in selected subgroups of patients. In unresectable locally advanced disease chemotherapy is active, whereas no high level evidence exists about a possible superiority of chemoradiation. Chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation represents a promising treatment schedule, resulting better than chemotherapy alone in a retrospective analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy is nowadays a standard treatment, with both 5-FU and gemcitabine resulted superior to observation. Instead adjuvant chemoradiation is not a standard, even though it can be suggested in selected subgroups of patients. In resectable locally advanced disease neoadjuvant therapy is still investigational. Chemoradiation or chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation produced promising results in phase II trials. Possible future gain in terms of survival could come from better neoadjuvant treatments in potentially resectable pancreatic carcinoma. Therefore, this setting should stimulate studies with new drugs and combinations and potential biological predictive factors.
胰腺癌预后极差,即使根治性切除后也是如此。在晚期疾病中,化疗在临床获益和症状缓解方面具有作用,而不是生存优势。自 1997 年以来,吉西他滨作为单一药物是一线标准治疗。几项试验未能证明化疗双联或吉西他滨联合生物制剂与吉西他滨单药治疗在 III 期试验中的生存优势。厄洛替尼是唯一一种与吉西他滨联合使用时在生存方面产生统计学显著改善的药物,而不是单独使用吉西他滨。然而,这些文献数据的临床应用仍然存在争议。然而,一项荟萃分析表明,联合化疗在生存和临床获益方面优于吉西他滨单药治疗,在选定的患者亚组中。在不可切除的局部晚期疾病中,化疗是有效的,而对于放化疗的可能优势尚无高级别证据。化疗后放化疗是一种很有前途的治疗方案,在回顾性分析中优于单纯化疗。辅助化疗目前是一种标准治疗方法,5-FU 和吉西他滨均优于观察。相反,辅助放化疗不是标准治疗,尽管可以在选定的患者亚组中建议使用。在可切除的局部晚期疾病中,新辅助治疗仍在研究中。放化疗或化疗后放化疗在 II 期试验中取得了有希望的结果。在潜在可切除的胰腺癌中,更好的新辅助治疗可能会带来生存方面的未来获益。因此,这种情况应该刺激新药物和联合用药以及潜在的生物学预测因素的研究。