Department of Medical Humanities and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bioethics. 2010 Jun;24(5):242-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01810.x.
Since its origin bioethics has been a specialized, academic discipline, focussing on moral issues, using a vast set of globalized principles and rational techniques to evaluate and guide healthcare practices. With the emergence of a plural society, the loss of faith in experts and authorities and the decline of overarching grand narratives and shared moralities, a new approach to bioethics is needed. This approach implies a shift from an external critique of practices towards embedded ethics and interactive practice improvement, and from a legal defence of rights towards fostering interdependent practices of responsibility. This article describes these transitions within bioethics in relation to the broader societal and cultural dynamics within Western societies, and traces the implications for the methodologies and changing roles of the bioethicist. The bioethicist we foresee is not just a clever expert but also a relationally sensitive person who engages stakeholders in reciprocal dialogues about their practice of responsibility and helps to integrate various sorts of knowledge (embodied, experiential, visual, and cognitive-scientific). In order to illustrate this new approach, we present a case study. It concerns a project focusing on an innovation in elderly care, based on the participation of various stakeholders, especially older people themselves.
自诞生以来,生命伦理学一直是一门专业化的学术学科,专注于道德问题,运用大量全球化的原则和理性技术来评估和指导医疗保健实践。随着多元化社会的出现,人们对专家和权威的信任丧失,以及总体性宏大叙事和共同道德的衰落,需要一种新的生命伦理学方法。这种方法意味着从对实践的外部批判转向嵌入式伦理和互动实践改进,从对权利的法律辩护转向促进相互依存的责任实践。本文描述了生命伦理学内部的这些转变与西方社会更广泛的社会和文化动态之间的关系,并探讨了这些转变对生命伦理学家的方法和不断变化的角色的影响。我们所预见的生命伦理学家不仅是一个聪明的专家,而且还是一个具有良好人际关系的人,他与利益相关者进行互惠对话,讨论他们的责任实践,并帮助整合各种知识(体现的、经验的、视觉的和认知科学的)。为了说明这种新方法,我们展示了一个案例研究。它涉及一个关注老年人护理创新的项目,该项目基于各种利益相关者的参与,特别是老年人自己的参与。