Suppr超能文献

软骨膜下鼻中隔成形术的水分离法——一项实验解剖研究。

Hydrodissection for subperichondrial septoplasty - an experimental anatomical study.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Rhinology. 2010 Jun;48(2):195-200. doi: 10.4193/Rhin09.120.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The effect of hydrostatic infiltrations for subperichondrial dissection is controversial. Classical textbooks promote it as the "key step in elevating the flaps" or consider its practicability "a mere fable". Moreover, case reports describe fatal side effects. Up to now, experimental tests are missing.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three surgeons simulated subperichondrial hydrodissection with 20 mineral salt fixed human cadaver heads. One ml lidocaine 5% with 1:105 adrenaline and India ink was infiltrated. Each septum was examined histologically using serial 3 microm sections in 150 microm intervals. Tissue cleavage containing the ink deposits with minimal distance to the proposed subperichondrial zone, intravasal spread and tissue deposition were analyzed.

RESULTS

Every injection produced a physical dissection (n = 20). However, dissected planes were localized mostly in the supra-perichondrial connective tissue (n = 8) or within the perichondrium (n = 4). Only five cases showed the propagated correct dissection in a subperichondrial zone. Three anomalous septa were excluded from quantitative analysis. Infiltrated matter did not only accumulate within the dissection plane but also penetrated the surrounding vessels of the septal intumescentia (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

Hydrostatic infiltrations represent an unreliable surgical technique for dissection of an anatomical correct subperichondrial plane but can be useful for anesthesia and hemostasis, however, using high pressure and high volume infiltrations might foster serious side effects.

摘要

目的

关于软骨膜下注水分离的效果存在争议。经典教科书将其推崇为“掀起皮瓣的关键步骤”,或者认为其可行性“只是一个传说”。此外,病例报告描述了致命的副作用。到目前为止,还缺乏实验测试。

设计

实验研究。

材料和方法

三位外科医生模拟软骨膜下的水分离,使用 20 个人体头颅的固定盐矿。注入 1 毫升 5%利多卡因加 1:105 肾上腺素和印度墨汁。每隔 150 微米用连续的 3 微米切片对每个隔进行组织学检查。分析含有墨水沉积物的组织分裂,最小距离到拟议的软骨膜下区域、血管内扩散和组织沉积。

结果

每次注射都产生了物理分离(n = 20)。然而,分离平面主要位于软骨膜上的结缔组织(n = 8)或软骨膜内(n = 4)。只有 5 例显示了在软骨膜下区域正确传播的分离。3 个异常隔被排除在定量分析之外。注入的物质不仅积聚在分离平面内,而且还穿透了隔膨胀的周围血管(n = 8)。

结论

静压注射是一种不可靠的手术技术,不能用于解剖正确的软骨膜下平面分离,但可用于麻醉和止血,然而,使用高压力和高容量的注射可能会导致严重的副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验