计算机辅助手术能否降低脊柱融合和骶髂螺钉置入的有效剂量?

Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Steinhoevelstr 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep;468(9):2419-29. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1393-6. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing use of fluoroscopy-based surgical procedures and the associated exposure to radiation raise questions regarding potential risks for patients and operating room personnel. Computer-assisted technologies can help to reduce the emission of radiation; the effect on the patient's dose for the three-dimensional (3-D)-based technologies has not yet been evaluated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined the effective and organ dose in dorsal spinal fusion and percutaneous transsacral screw stabilization during conventional fluoroscopy-assisted and computer-navigated procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recorded the dose and duration of radiation from fluoroscopy in 20 patients, with single vertebra fractures of the lumbar spine, who underwent posterior stabilization with and without the use of a navigation system and 20 patients with navigated percutaneous transsacral screw stabilization for sacroiliac joint injuries. For the conventional iliosacral joint operations, the duration of radiation was estimated retrospectively in two cases and further determined from the literature. Dose measurements were performed with a male phantom; the phantom was equipped with thermoluminescence dosimeters.

RESULTS

The effective dose in conventional spine surgery using 2-D fluoroscopy was more than 12-fold greater than in navigated operations. For the sacroiliac joint, the effective dose was nearly fivefold greater for nonnavigated operations.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional fluoroscopy, the patient's effective dose can be reduced by 3-D computer-assisted spinal and pelvic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

基于透视的外科手术的应用日益增多,以及随之而来的辐射暴露问题,使人们对患者和手术室人员的潜在风险产生了疑问。计算机辅助技术有助于减少辐射的发射;但是,尚未评估其对三维(3-D)技术患者剂量的影响。

问题/目的:我们确定了传统透视辅助和计算机导航手术中经皮经骶骨螺钉固定术和后路脊柱融合术的有效剂量和器官剂量。

患者和方法

我们记录了 20 例因单节段腰椎骨折而行后路稳定术患者的透视辐射剂量和时间,这些患者分别接受了和未接受导航系统的治疗,以及 20 例因骶髂关节损伤而行导航经皮经骶骨螺钉固定术的患者。对于传统的骶髂关节手术,有 2 例手术的辐射时间是通过回顾性估计的,其余的则从文献中确定。使用男性模拟体进行剂量测量;该模拟体配备有热释光剂量计。

结果

在使用二维透视的常规脊柱手术中,有效剂量比导航手术高出 12 倍以上。对于骶髂关节,非导航手术的有效剂量高出近 5 倍。

结论

与传统透视相比,3-D 计算机辅助脊柱和骨盆手术可降低患者的有效剂量。

证据水平

II 级,治疗性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见《作者指南》。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索