Department of Geography, Queen's University, 99 University Avenue, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Int J Health Geogr. 2010 Jun 4;9:27. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-27.
A 30 minute drive time threshold has often been cited as indicative of accessible health services. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a chronic disease management program designed to enhance and maintain cardiovascular health, and geographic barriers to utilization are often cited. The purpose of this study was to empirically test the drive time threshold for CR utilization.
A prospective study, using a multi-level design of coronary artery disease outpatients nested within 97 cardiologists. Participants completed a baseline sociodemographic survey, and reported CR referral, enrollment and participation in a second survey 9 months later. CR utilization was verified with CR sites. Geographic information systems were used to generate drive times at 60, 80 and 100% of the speed limit to the closest CR site from participants' homes, to take into consideration various traffic conditions. Bivariate analysis was used to test for differences in CR referral, enrollment and degree of participation by drive time. Logistic regression was used to test drive time increments where significant differences were found.
Drive times were generated for 1209 outpatients. Overall, CR referral was verified for 523 (43.3%) outpatients, with verified enrollment for 444 (36.7%) participating in a mean of 86.4 +/- 25.7% of prescribed sessions. There were significant differences in CR referral and enrollment by drive time (ps < .01), but not degree of participation. Logistic regression analysis (ps < .001) revealed that the drive time threshold at 80% of the posted speed limit for physician referral may be 60 minutes (OR = .26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.55), and the threshold for patient CR enrollment may also be 60 minutes (OR = .11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.33).
Physicians may be taking geography into consideration when referring patients to CR. Empirical consideration also reveals that patients are significantly less likely to enroll in CR where they must drive 60 minutes or more to the closest program. Once enrolled, distance has no significant effect on degree of participation.
30 分钟车程时间阈值常被认为是可获得的医疗服务的指标。心脏康复(CR)是一种慢性病管理计划,旨在增强和维持心血管健康,而利用地理障碍常被提及。本研究的目的是实证检验 CR 利用的驾驶时间阈值。
采用冠状动脉疾病门诊患者嵌套在 97 位心脏病专家中的多层次设计进行前瞻性研究。参与者完成了基线社会人口统计学调查,并在 9 个月后的第二次调查中报告了 CR 转诊、入组和参与情况。CR 的使用情况通过 CR 地点得到了验证。地理信息系统用于根据参与者家庭到最近 CR 地点的限速生成 60%、80%和 100%的驾驶时间,以考虑各种交通状况。使用双变量分析测试驾驶时间差异对 CR 转诊、入组和参与程度的影响。对于发现有显著差异的驾驶时间增量,使用逻辑回归进行测试。
为 1209 名门诊患者生成了驾驶时间。总体而言,对 523 名(43.3%)门诊患者进行了 CR 转诊验证,对 444 名(36.7%)参加者进行了验证,他们平均参加了规定疗程的 86.4+/-25.7%。CR 转诊和入组的差异有统计学意义(p<0.01),但参与程度没有差异。逻辑回归分析(p<0.001)显示,医生转诊的 80%限速驾驶时间阈值可能为 60 分钟(OR=0.26,95%CI:0.13-0.55),患者 CR 入组的阈值也可能为 60 分钟(OR=0.11,95%CI:0.04-0.33)。
医生在将患者转诊到 CR 时可能会考虑到地理因素。实证考虑还表明,患者开车 60 分钟或以上才能到达最近的项目时,他们参加 CR 的可能性显著降低。一旦入组,距离对参与程度没有显著影响。