National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, University College Hospitals NHS Trust; Department of Clinical & Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London,WC1N 3BG, UK.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2006 Feb;6(1):13-8. doi: 10.1586/14737167.6.1.13.
Carbamazepine is widely recommended as a first-line antiepileptic drug for new-onset partial seizures with or without generalization. Branded carbamazepine remains commonly prescribed. Newer antiepileptic drugs have higher acquisition costs than carbamazepine, but may offer advantages in terms of tolerability and side-effect profile that may offset their additional cost. Furthermore, generic carbamazepine is often cheaper than branded forms, and many argue for a policy of prescribing the cheapest available generic form. This study reviews the scant health economic data concerning the use of carbamazepine to treat epilepsy to establish whether use of this drug is cost effective. Carbamazepine would appear to be a cost-effective treatment for epilepsy in certain contexts, although evidence from a prospective, randomized, controlled trial is awaited and this assertion may not be true for certain patient subgroups, or in developing world health services. Furthermore, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support policies of cheapest generic or brand-only prescribing.
卡马西平被广泛推荐为新诊断的部分发作性癫痫伴或不伴全面发作的一线抗癫痫药物。品牌卡马西平仍然经常被开处方。新型抗癫痫药物的购置成本高于卡马西平,但在耐受性和副作用方面可能具有优势,这可能会抵消其额外成本。此外,普通卡马西平通常比品牌形式便宜,许多人主张开最便宜的可用通用形式的处方。本研究回顾了关于使用卡马西平治疗癫痫的少量健康经济学数据,以确定使用该药物是否具有成本效益。在某些情况下,卡马西平似乎是一种具有成本效益的癫痫治疗方法,尽管仍在等待前瞻性、随机、对照试验的证据,而且对于某些特定患者群体或发展中国家的卫生服务而言,这一说法可能并不正确。此外,目前尚无足够证据支持最便宜的通用或仅品牌处方的政策。