Suppr超能文献

[德国创伤中心不同的病死率:批判性分析]

[Different case fatality rates at German trauma centres : Critical analysis].

作者信息

Hilbert P, Lefering R, Stuttmann R

机构信息

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, BG-Kliniken Bergmannstrost, Halle, Saale, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2010 Aug;59(8):700-3, 706-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1742-6. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The level of trauma care in Germany belongs to one of the best worldwide. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown significant differences in the case fatality rates of multiple trauma patients in German trauma centres. The objective of this study was to indentify the reasons for the different outcomes based on data of the trauma registry of the German Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology.

METHODS

Due to the inadequacy of comparing only the case fataltiy rates in the different trauma centres, the data recorded in the trauma registry were analyzed in a retrospective, multicentre study to calculate the probability of survival, revised injury severity classification (RISC) and, additionally, the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for ranking of the participating trauma centres. As a criterion for inclusion in the study, a minimum of 100 trauma patients admitted directly from the scene within a 4 year period was set. The ranking was carried out using the SMR (observed mortality divided by probability of survival). With the help of data from the trauma registry an attempt was made to find the differences in trauma management between the top 10 centres (lowest SMR), the 10 middle and the last 10 centres (highest SMR) in the ranking.

RESULTS

The data of 6,522 patients were included in the study. There were significant differences in the pre-hospital time, the time spent in the emergency room (ER) and time until a CT scan had been performed. Pre-hospital time was longer in patients admitted to the top centres, whereas time in the ER was longer in the last centres of the ranking. Comparing the sum of pre-hospital time and time in the ER, there were no differences between the top and the last centres. At the scene of accident overall intubation rate and intubation rate in patients with traumatic brain injury were higher in patients admitted to the top centres. Regarding the transport modality, significantly more patients were transported by helicopter in the group of the top centres. In top centres CT scans, in particular whole-body CTs, were initiated sooner and used much more frequently so that the rate of missed injuries was much lower. The amount of fluid given at the scene of accident did not differ between the centres but the amount of fluid given in ER and the operating room until admission to the intensive care unit was significantly higher in the top centres.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in the pre-hospital and clinical care of patients admitted to German trauma centres. Under clinical conditions a tight time management, an immediate and complete diagnostic approach, particularly by means of whole-body CT and a liberal fluid resuscitation seem to be favorable factors.

摘要

目的

德国的创伤救治水平位居世界前列。然而,先前的研究表明,德国各创伤中心多发伤患者的病死率存在显著差异。本研究的目的是根据德国骨科学与创伤外科学会创伤登记处的数据,确定导致不同治疗结果的原因。

方法

由于仅比较不同创伤中心的病死率存在不足,因此在一项回顾性多中心研究中,对创伤登记处记录的数据进行分析,以计算生存概率、修订后的损伤严重程度分类(RISC),此外,还计算参与研究的创伤中心排名的标准化死亡率(SMR)。作为纳入本研究的标准,设定在4年期间内至少有100例直接从事故现场入院的创伤患者。使用SMR(观察到的死亡率除以生存概率)进行排名。借助创伤登记处的数据,试图找出排名前10的中心(SMR最低)、中间的10个中心和最后10个中心(SMR最高)在创伤管理方面的差异。

结果

本研究纳入了6522例患者的数据。院前时间、在急诊室(ER)花费的时间以及直到进行CT扫描的时间存在显著差异。排名靠前的中心收治的患者院前时间较长,而排名靠后的中心患者在急诊室的时间较长。比较院前时间和在急诊室的时间总和,排名靠前和靠后的中心之间没有差异。在事故现场,排名靠前的中心收治的患者总体插管率和创伤性脑损伤患者的插管率较高。关于运输方式,排名靠前的中心组中乘坐直升机转运的患者明显更多。在排名靠前的中心,CT扫描,尤其是全身CT扫描启动得更早且使用频率更高,因此漏诊率要低得多。各中心在事故现场给予的液体量没有差异,但在急诊室和手术室直到入住重症监护病房前给予的液体量在排名靠前的中心明显更高。

结论

德国创伤中心收治患者的院前和临床护理存在显著差异。在临床情况下,严格的时间管理、即时且全面的诊断方法,尤其是通过全身CT以及宽松的液体复苏似乎是有利因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验