Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1097-101. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1395-9. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
Medicare has selected 10 hospital-acquired conditions for which it will not reimburse hospitals unless the condition was documented as "present on admission." This "no pay for errors" rule may have a profound effect on the clinical practice of physicians.
To determine how physicians might change their behavior after learning about the Medicare rule.
We conducted a randomized trial of a brief educational intervention embedded in an online survey, using clinical vignettes to estimate behavioral changes.
At a university-based internal medicine residency program, 168 internal medicine residents were eligible to participate.
Residents were randomized to receive a one-page description of Medicare's "no pay for errors" rule with pre-vignette reminders (intervention group) or no information (control group). Residents responded to five clinical vignettes in which "no pay for errors" conditions might be present on admission.
Primary outcome was selection of the single most clinically appropriate option from three clinical practice choices presented for each clinical vignette.
Survey administered from December 2008 to March 2009. There were 119 responses (71%). In four of five vignettes, the intervention group was less likely to select the most clinically appropriate response. This was statistically significant in two of the cases. Most residents were aware of the rule but not its impact and specifics. Residents acknowledged responsibility to know Medicare documentation rules but felt poorly trained to do so. Residents educated about the Medicare's "no pay for errors" were less likely to select the most clinically appropriate responses to clinical vignettes. Such choices, if implemented in practice, have the potential for causing patient harm through unnecessary tests, procedures, and other interventions.
医疗保险选择了 10 种医院获得性疾病,除非这些疾病被记录为“入院时存在”,否则医疗保险将不予报销。这项“错误不付费”规则可能会对医生的临床实践产生深远影响。
确定医生在了解医疗保险规则后可能会如何改变他们的行为。
我们进行了一项在线调查中的简短教育干预随机试验,使用临床案例来估计行为变化。
在一个基于大学的内科住院医师培训项目中,168 名内科住院医师有资格参与。
住院医师被随机分配接受一页关于医疗保险“错误不付费”规则的描述,并附有预案例提醒(干预组)或没有信息(对照组)。住院医师对五个临床案例做出反应,其中“错误不付费”的情况可能在入院时存在。
主要结果是从每个临床案例提出的三种临床实践选择中选择单一最符合临床实际的选项。
调查于 2008 年 12 月至 2009 年 3 月进行。共收到 119 份回复(71%)。在五个案例中的四个案例中,干预组不太可能选择最符合临床实际的反应。这种情况在两种情况下具有统计学意义。大多数住院医师都知道该规则,但不知道其影响和具体内容。住院医师承认有责任了解医疗保险文件规则,但觉得自己没有得到充分的培训。接受过医疗保险“错误不付费”教育的住院医师不太可能选择最符合临床案例的反应。如果在实践中实施这些选择,可能会通过不必要的检查、程序和其他干预措施对患者造成伤害。