Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jun;1198:35-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05430.x.
Spinal motoneurons (MNs) amplify synaptic inputs by producing strong dendritic persistent inward currents (PICs), which allow the MN to generate the firing rates and forces necessary for normal behaviors. However, PICs prolong MN depolarization after the initial excitation is removed, tend to "wind-up" with repeated activation and are regulated by a diffuse neuromodulatory system that affects all motor pools. We have shown that PICs are very sensitive to reciprocal inhibition from Ia afferents of antagonist muscles and as a result PIC amplification is related to limb configuration. Because reciprocal inhibition is tightly focused, shared only between strict anatomical antagonists, this system opposes the diffuse effects of the descending neuromodulation that facilitates PICs. Because inhibition appears necessary for PIC control, we hypothesize that Ia inhibition interacts with Ia excitation in a "push-pull" fashion, in which a baseline of simultaneous excitation and inhibition allows depolarization to occur via both excitation and disinhibition (and vice versa for hyperpolarization). Push-pull control appears to mitigate the undesirable affects associated with the PIC while still taking full advantage of PIC amplification.
脊髓运动神经元 (MNs) 通过产生强的树突持久内向电流 (PICs) 来放大突触输入,这使得 MN 能够产生正常行为所需的发放频率和力。然而,PICs 在初始兴奋去除后延长 MN 的去极化,随着重复激活而倾向于“累积”,并受影响所有运动池的弥散神经调制系统调节。我们已经表明,PICs 对来自拮抗肌 Ia 传入的交互抑制非常敏感,因此 PIC 放大与肢体构型有关。由于交互抑制是严格集中的,仅在严格的解剖学拮抗剂之间共享,因此该系统与促进 PICs 的下行神经调制的弥散效应相反。由于抑制似乎对于 PIC 控制是必需的,我们假设 Ia 抑制与 Ia 兴奋以“推挽”方式相互作用,其中同时存在兴奋和抑制的基线允许通过兴奋和去抑制来发生去极化(反之亦然,用于超极化)。推挽控制似乎减轻了与 PIC 相关的不良影响,同时仍然充分利用了 PIC 放大。