Departamento de Ciências Sociais, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2010 Jun;44(3):559-65. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102010000300021.
Reporting of observational studies is often inadequate, hampering the assessment of their strengths and weaknesses and, consequently, the generalization of study results. The initiative named Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) developed a checklist of 22 items, the STROBE Statement, with recommendations about what should be included in a more accurate and complete description of observational studies. Between June and December 2008, a group of Brazilian researchers was dedicated to the translation and adaptation of the STROBE Statement into Portuguese. The present study aimed to show the translation into Portuguese, introduce the discussion on the context of use, the potential and limitations of the STROBE initiative.
观察性研究报告通常不够充分，这阻碍了对其优缺点的评估，进而影响了研究结果的推广。名为“加强观察性研究的报告质量（STROBE）”的倡议制定了一份包含 22 个项目的检查表，即 STROBE 声明，其中包含了有关如何更准确和完整地描述观察性研究的建议。在 2008 年 6 月至 12 月期间，一组巴西研究人员致力于将 STROBE 声明翻译成葡萄牙语。本研究旨在展示其葡萄牙语译文，介绍 STROBE 倡议的使用背景、潜力和局限性的讨论。
