Clinic of Dental and Oral Pathology, Faculty of Odontology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Eiveniu 2, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Jul;26(4):445-52. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0799-4. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
In 30 patients with periodontitis, a total of 278 teeth exhibiting bleeding on probing, subgingival calculus, and a probing depth between 3-6 mm were examined. For each participant, two treatment types were alternatively applied on the contralateral quadrants: scaling and root planing (SRP) as control, and SRP followed by Er,Cr:YSGG laser application (SRP+laser), as a test method. Five clinical parameters: plaque level, bleeding on probing, probing depth, gingival recession and clinical attachment level were examined at baseline and at 2, 3, 6, 12 months after treatment. Of the total of 1,668 sites examined in all patients, 1,088 sites were found with a probing depth of 3-6 mm. In these sites, differences in clinical parameters between SRP and SRP+laser-treated quadrants were analyzed, assuming the level of p < 0.05 as significant. After 2 months from baseline, the mean probing depth reduction and the clinical attachment level gain were significantly greater in SRP+laser than in SRP quadrants, and remained so throughout the study (p < 0.001). A marked reduction of the bleeding scores occurred in all examined sites, irrespective of the treatment method. However, after 12 months, significantly less teeth exhibited bleeding on probing in SRP+laser quadrants than in SRP quadrants (p < 0.001). The mean plaque and gingival recession levels did not differ between the SRP and SRP+laser quadrants neither before nor after the treatment. The periodontal procedures either using Er,Cr:YSGG laser after SRP or SRP alone, lead to significant improvements in all clinical parameters investigated. However, laser application, as an adjunct to SRP, appeared to be more advantageous.
在 30 名患有牙周炎的患者中,共检查了 278 颗探诊出血、龈下结石和探诊深度在 3-6mm 之间的牙齿。对于每个参与者,在对侧象限上交替应用两种治疗类型:刮治和根面平整(SRP)作为对照,SRP 后应用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光(SRP+激光)作为试验方法。在基线和治疗后 2、3、6、12 个月检查了 5 个临床参数:菌斑指数、探诊出血、探诊深度、牙龈退缩和临床附着水平。在所有患者的总共 1668 个检查部位中,有 1088 个部位的探诊深度为 3-6mm。在这些部位,分析了 SRP 和 SRP+激光治疗象限之间的临床参数差异,假设 p<0.05 为显著差异。从基线开始 2 个月后,SRP+激光象限的平均探诊深度减少和临床附着水平增加明显大于 SRP 象限,并且在整个研究过程中保持不变(p<0.001)。所有检查部位的出血评分均明显降低,无论治疗方法如何。然而,治疗 12 个月后,SRP+激光象限的探诊出血牙齿明显少于 SRP 象限(p<0.001)。在治疗前后,SRP 和 SRP+激光象限的平均菌斑和牙龈退缩水平没有差异。无论是在 SRP 后使用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光还是单独使用 SRP,牙周程序都能显著改善所有研究的临床参数。然而,激光应用作为 SRP 的辅助手段似乎更有利。