Department of Experimental Pathology and Oncology, University of Firenze, Viale G.B. Morgagni 50, 50134 Firenze, Italy.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;674:23-32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6066-5_3.
Protein-protein interactions between integrins and ion channels consist in a complicated bidirectional talk, not yet understood in detail, which triggers a downstream signaling network. Such a coordinated process occurs in discrete, localized microcompartments and involves different membrane and cytoplasmic proteins. Since the early nineties, when the first functional association between integrins and ion channels was characterized, the number of similar examples is constantly increasing. Identifying the components of this pathway has general importance for cell physiology and will eventually lead to fully understand the role of ion channels in the physiological processes typically controlled by integrin receptors, such as cell adhesion, migration and proliferation. Here, we detail the main experimental methods currently available to study these processes and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Biochemical copurification and genetic interaction studies, as well as high-throughput screening, can be performed to initially identify the interacting proteins. Successively, in vitro binding assays such as pull-down and immunoprecipitation-based techniques allow to verify and better characterize these partnerships, possibly in combination with mass spectrometry methods. When transient interactions are involved, more sophisticated techniques, such as photoaffinity labelingprocedures, are necessary to detect the multiprotein complexes by having them covalently bound together as they interact. To provide even more thorough analyses of the formation, function and composition of protein complexes, other technologies such as confocal microscopy, fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy and site directed mutagenesis (possibly in murine models) have to be performed. The progressive accumulation of data defining novel protein-protein interactions has been considerably accelerated by the identification of specific sequence motifs that regulate integrin binding to other proteins as well as integrin recognition sequences in the ligand. Moreover, the availability of protein tagging strategies and the increased sensitivity of mass spectrometry-based methods for protein identification have also contributed important tools. In the near future, the coupling of traditional techniques with proteomic approaches is likely to offer invaluable help in unraveling integrin-ion channel interactions, thus elucidating the biological implication of these complexes.
整合素与离子通道之间的蛋白-蛋白相互作用构成了一种复杂的双向对话,目前尚未详细了解,这种对话会触发下游信号转导网络。这种协调的过程发生在离散的、局部的微区室中,涉及不同的膜和细胞质蛋白。自 90 年代初首次描述整合素与离子通道之间的第一个功能关联以来,类似的例子不断增加。鉴定该途径的组成部分对于细胞生理学具有普遍意义,并最终将导致完全理解离子通道在通常由整合素受体控制的生理过程中的作用,例如细胞黏附、迁移和增殖。在这里,我们详细介绍了目前用于研究这些过程的主要实验方法,并讨论了它们的优缺点。可以进行生化共纯化和遗传相互作用研究以及高通量筛选,以最初鉴定相互作用的蛋白质。随后,体外结合测定,如下拉和基于免疫沉淀的技术,可用于验证和更好地表征这些相互作用,可能与质谱方法结合使用。当涉及瞬时相互作用时,需要更复杂的技术,例如光亲和标记程序,以便在它们相互作用时将多蛋白复合物共价结合在一起,从而检测到它们。为了更全面地分析蛋白复合物的形成、功能和组成,还必须使用共聚焦显微镜、荧光共振能量转移显微镜和定点突变(可能在鼠模型中)等其他技术。通过鉴定调节整合素与其他蛋白结合以及配体中整合素识别序列的特定序列基序,极大地加速了定义新蛋白-蛋白相互作用的新数据的积累。此外,蛋白标记策略的可用性和基于质谱的蛋白鉴定方法的灵敏度提高也提供了重要的工具。在不久的将来,将传统技术与蛋白质组学方法相结合,可能有助于阐明整合素-离子通道相互作用,从而阐明这些复合物的生物学意义。