Jansson O K, Zilling T L, Walther B S
Department of Surgery, Lund University, Sweden.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Jul;34(7):557-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02049894.
In 10 pigs a nonsutured, glued colonic anastomosis was constructed with a modified stapling device without staples and compared with an EEA-stapled anastomosis and a one-layer-sutured anastomosis concerning radiologic appearance, breaking strength, circulation, and collagen concentration. 141Ce-labeled microspheres were used for measurements of the anastomotic blood flow before the animals were sacrificed on the 4th postoperative day. The breaking strength was recorded and an anastomotic index calculated. No leakage was found. The anastomotic width did not differ between the groups, but the interindividual variation was more prominent in the sutured group. The handsewn and stapled anastomoses were stronger than the glued anastomosis (P = 0.0009 and 0.0054, respectively). There was an increase in the anastomotic circulation in all of the anastomoses, but no differences were seen between groups. The collagen concentration was independent of the technique used.
在10头猪身上,使用一种改良的无钉吻合器构建了非缝合、粘合的结肠吻合术,并与端端吻合器吻合术和单层缝合吻合术在放射学表现、断裂强度、血液循环和胶原蛋白浓度方面进行了比较。在术后第4天处死动物前,使用141Ce标记的微球测量吻合口血流量。记录断裂强度并计算吻合指数。未发现渗漏。各组之间吻合口宽度无差异,但缝合组个体间差异更显著。手工缝合和吻合器吻合比粘合吻合更强(分别为P = 0.0009和0.0054)。所有吻合口的吻合口循环均增加,但各组之间未见差异。胶原蛋白浓度与所使用的技术无关。