• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低手术量医院与高手术量医院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的中转率:有差异吗?

Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low versus high-volume hospitals: is there a difference?

作者信息

Zehetner Jörg, Leidl Stefan, Wuttke Markus E, Wayand Wolfgang, Shamiyeh Andreas

机构信息

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Operative Laparoscopy, 2nd Surgical Department, Academic Teaching Hospital, AKH Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Jun;20(3):173-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181df9dac.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181df9dac
PMID:20551817
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) have diminished over the last decade but still conversion rate is about 5% to 6% in elective cases and higher in acute cholecystitis.

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze whether the conversion rate is related to low (100 LC/y) versus high-volume hospitals (HVHs; >300 LC/y).

METHODS

From 1999 to 2004, operations were performed in a low-volume hospital (LVH) and a HVH, divided into 3 groups: primary open cholecystectomy (OC), LC, and conversion (CC). These groups were analyzed with regard to indications, intraoperative findings, reason for conversion, and postoperative complications, and compared between the 2 hospitals.

RESULTS

In LVHs of the 550 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 19 were OC (3.5%). Of the 531 patients who were started with laparoscopy, 5.3% (28 patients) were CC. In HVHs of the 1634 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 82 were OC (5%). Of the 1552 patients who were started with laparoscopy, 5.8% (85 patients) were CC; P=0.7496. Dense adhesions (LVH 35.8% and HVH 37.6%, P=0.8544), severe cholecystitis (LVH 39.8% and HVH 34%, P=0.6199), and difficulties with the anatomy in Calot's triangle (LVH 7.2% and HVH 8.2%, P=0.8531) were the main reasons for conversion. There was no difference in the postoperative complication rate and reoperation rate between a LVH and a HVH.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in conversion rate in LC in LVHs versus HVHs. The quality of LC and even CC is similar in LVH and HVH.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的禁忌证有所减少,但在择期手术中其转换率仍约为5%至6%,在急性胆囊炎中则更高。

目的

本研究旨在分析转换率是否与低手术量医院(每年100例LC)和高手术量医院(HVHs;每年>300例LC)有关。

方法

1999年至2004年期间,在一家低手术量医院(LVH)和一家HVH进行手术,分为3组:初次开腹胆囊切除术(OC)、LC和转换手术(CC)。对这些组进行了适应证、术中发现、转换原因和术后并发症的分析,并在两家医院之间进行了比较。

结果

在接受胆囊切除术的550例患者的LVHs中,19例为OC(3.5%)。在开始进行腹腔镜检查的531例患者中,5.3%(28例患者)为CC。在接受胆囊切除术的1634例患者的HVHs中,82例为OC(5%)。在开始进行腹腔镜检查的1552例患者中,5.8%(85例患者)为CC;P = 0.7496。致密粘连(LVH为35.8%,HVH为37.6%,P = 0.8544)、严重胆囊炎(LVH为39.8%,HVH为34%,P = 0.6199)以及Calot三角区解剖困难(LVH为7.2%,HVH为8.2%,P = 0.8531)是转换的主要原因。LVH和HVH之间的术后并发症发生率和再次手术率没有差异。

结论

LVHs与HVHs的LC转换率没有差异。LVH和HVH的LC甚至CC的质量相似。

相似文献

1
Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low versus high-volume hospitals: is there a difference?低手术量医院与高手术量医院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的中转率:有差异吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Jun;20(3):173-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181df9dac.
2
A 14-year analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: conversion--when and why?腹腔镜胆囊切除术的14年分析:中转手术——时机与原因?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Aug;17(4):271-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805d093b.
3
Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals.退伍军人健康管理局医院中开腹胆囊切除术及转为开腹胆囊切除术的趋势、结果和预测因素。
Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.020.
4
Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者的腹腔镜治疗与开放手术治疗对比
Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Mar-Apr;46(26):753-7.
5
Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy.择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹胆囊切除术的危险因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Dec;179(6):696-704.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: complications and conversions with the 3-trocar technique: a 10-year review.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:三孔技术的并发症与中转开腹:一项10年回顾
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Oct;17(5):380-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180dca5d6.
7
Outpatient cholecystectomy at hospitals versus freestanding ambulatory surgical centers.医院门诊胆囊切除术与独立门诊手术中心的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.042. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Is xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis the most difficult for laparoscopic cholecystectomy?黄色肉芽肿性胆囊炎是腹腔镜胆囊切除术最难处理的情况吗?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 May-Jun;56(91-92):597-601.
9
A metaanalysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Dec;197(6):921-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.011.
10
Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:对瑞士腹腔镜与胸腔镜外科学会数据库中22953例连续病例的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between surgical volume and outcomes in elective and acute cholecystectomy: nationwide, observational study.择期和急性胆囊切除术的手术量与结局的关系:全国性观察性研究。
Br J Surg. 2023 Feb 15;110(3):353-361. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac415.
2
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术治疗重症胆囊炎
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):526-531. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4235-5. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
3
Is the male gender an independent risk factor for complication in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?
男性性别是否是急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者发生并发症的独立危险因素?
Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):854-9. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00151.1.