Smirmaul B P C, Dantas J L, Fontes E B, Altimari L R, Okano A H, Moraes A C
University of Campinas--UNICAMP, SP, Brazil.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr-Jun;50(3-4):149-54.
The purpose of this study was to identify and compare the Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold (EMG(FT)) determined in the Vastus Lateralis (VL), Rectus Femoris (RF), Biceps Femoris (BF), Semitendinosus (ST) and Tibialis Anterior (TA) during stationary cycling in trained cyclists and non-cyclists. Using a cycle ergometer, 13 cyclists (28.4 +/- 6.9 years; 70.3 +/- 13 kg; 176.1 +/- 8.5 cm) and 11 non-cyclists (25.8 +/- 4 years; 73 +/- 9.1 kg; 175 +/- 6.4 cm), performed a maximum incremental test (ITmax) (90 rpm) to determine the (EMG(FT)). Maximal power output (W(PEAK)) reached by cyclists was higher than for non-cyclists (372.6 W and 248.9 W respectively) (P < 0.01). For the five muscles analyzed in cyclists, EMG(FT) occurred at 85.7% of cases in the VL, 92.9% in RE 78.6% in BE 78.6% in ST and 50% in TA, while in the non-cyclists group, this occurrence was 100% to muscle VL, 100% to RF, 92.6% to BF, 78.6% to ST, and 78.6% to TA. Analyzing the percentage corresponding to the power at EMG(FT) in relation to W(PEAK) reached, no differences between groups were observed for RF, BF and ST, however VL and TA, as well as the mean from all muscles were lower for cyclists than non-cyclists (P < 0.05). The present results showed that EMG(FT) is more easily identified in RF and VL muscles for both groups, and it may be an interesting method to evaluate the adaptive responses from aerobic and anaerobic metabolisms during cycling training programs.
本研究的目的是识别和比较在训练有素的自行车运动员和非自行车运动员进行固定自行车骑行时,股外侧肌(VL)、股直肌(RF)、股二头肌(BF)、半腱肌(ST)和胫骨前肌(TA)中测定的肌电图疲劳阈值(EMG(FT))。使用自行车测力计,13名自行车运动员(28.4±6.9岁;70.3±13千克;176.1±8.5厘米)和11名非自行车运动员(25.8±4岁;73±9.1千克;175±6.4厘米)进行了最大递增测试(ITmax)(90转/分钟)以确定(EMG(FT))。自行车运动员达到的最大功率输出(W(PEAK))高于非自行车运动员(分别为372.6瓦和248.9瓦)(P<0.01)。对于自行车运动员分析的五块肌肉,EMG(FT)在VL中85.7%的情况下出现,RE中92.9%,BE中78.6%,ST中78.6%,TA中50%,而在非自行车运动员组中,VL肌肉的发生率为100%,RF为100%,BF为92.6%,ST为78.6%,TA为78.6%。分析与达到的W(PEAK)相关的EMG(FT)时的功率百分比,RF、BF和ST组间未观察到差异,然而自行车运动员的VL和TA以及所有肌肉的平均值低于非自行车运动员(P<0.05)。目前的结果表明,两组在RF和VL肌肉中更容易识别EMG(FT),并且它可能是评估自行车训练计划中有氧和无氧代谢适应性反应的一种有趣方法。